Saint_clark

John Westwood on Solent...saying they want someone (doesn't have to have a lot of money) who can secure the future of the club? You'd need a LOT to do that!

Team; Bialkowski. Richardson, Martin, Fox, Harding. Puncheon, Hammond©, Reeves, De Ridder. Barnard, Lambert Subs; Davis, Stephens, Shaw, Ward-Prowse, Holmes, Jaidi, Lee

I reckon Puncheon will be CM with Reeves left and De Ridder right. Fox will obviously play CB, although with Richardsons strength he might have been the better option there.

Harsh. He looked very good at the start of this season alongside Fonte.

Dark Brotherhood? I assume they're in this one.

I reckon we've been planning for a new keeper for at least the last year. There must be hundreds of keepers on the continent who could play in the Prem - I'd hope our scouts have been watching them closely.

This. No hard feelings towards the guy whatsoever, he did exactly what he was brought here to do. People constantly complain about back-up not performing when it is required of them - well this guy did.

I sincerely apologise for being out on a Friday night. I don't know what came over me.

Not quite - they said they were looking at implementing it at some point in the future.

Fair play to you mate, how did you find the trip itself?

Adkins face towards the end of the conference when it was all in japanese was brilliant

I didn't even realise his record was that good!

How on earth is Guly NOT a reliable source of goals and assists? Not sure why crosses even comes into it, but if we're counting those as well - there is no way Davies would run the wings more than Guly.

Both of whom are full-backs and technical players. They're not tough tackling defensive minded players, which is the point I was making.

That's what I was thinking. Pretty sure it's only compulsory till year 9, not 11.

That's three. And none of them in the last decade. Compared to god knows how many forward thinking players who are now in the NPC/Premiership...

How long has it been compulsory...?

Agreed. Dune, you have made yourself look absolutely childish in this thread. Seeing as you're now refusing to debate any of the points raised, preferring instead to just take the p*ss, I'm closing this thread. "Blah blah, CoC conspiracy, worse than the freemasons etc".

He didn't say he liked it, just that he hadn't seen a good one. But the adams family one above is pretty awesome.

We've always been a more "technical" academy. Produced plenty of decent to good wingers/forwards - but how many good centrebacks, keepers or hard tackling midfielders?

As I said before, the only thing Adkins did last night that I disagree with was leaving Harding in and putting Richardson on the bench. Just because Harding "did a job" against two poor teams out of position doesn't mean you should leave out one of our most underrated players. I firmly believe we would not have conceded that first goal had Richardson played, and we'd obviously have had much more threat going forward.

So he hasn't got 7 assists either then?

Just re-read this, and it sounds to me like you're suggesting Adkins simply had to pick the team and let them get on with it. Pardew signed most of the team, yes, but it wasn't his "wave of optimism and belief". That was down 100% to Nigel Adkins.

Take it like a fan from Soccer AM I assume, so "Fenners" and Charlotte Jackson.