Gingeletiss

Perhaps Mr Triesman should of looked closer to home, for his corruption story. It has been right under his nose for years, and in particular, these last two. His acceptence of the Portsmouth situation, is nothing short of a disgrace, and for that alone, I'd sack him.

I honestly believe, that you think you are a better manager than Pardew. You've spent a season slating him, now you question his retained list, like you are all knowledgeable about the reasons why players stay and go. Every one pretty much agrees with the cul, but not Alps, he knows best.

So Mr Tickle, where do you propose that the Billions upon Billions, this country owes in debt, comes from. Who is to pay? Labour, not for the first time, has caused this debt, by borrowing to pay for it's policys. Th Conservatives, not for the first time, are now having to clean up the sh1t, that is Labours legacy. Look forward to your answer.

Whilst I wanted them to get beat by ten, I'll settle for the one, as they will feel that they were close to winning, so a 1-0 defeat will hurt big style. I laughed when Grant done his interview, claiming Poopey should of won, what planet was he on, hello! they hit the woodwork five times in the first half alone Toady.

Off the post again, but IN

Thank ferk for that:butthead:

Lol....Cech just took the throw in:D

Five times now, the bloody goal is going to come down soon:mad:

Four now, only this one was over the line:mad:

Yeh! well that's a good thing. He doesn't have to waste time running round his man, he just darts between their legs;)

You've missed something, suggest you start again at post 1.

Two years ago Portsmouth were also in the FA Cup final and on the brink of a 1-0 triumph over Cardiff City at Wembley, the club's first major trophy for 58 years. Ahead of that day Sacha Gaydamak, the then owner, spoke of his determination to secure Portsmouth's stability. "We're an expanding club which requires investment," he said. "I don't believe in generating debt, the club has been in existence for 110 years and whoever comes after me shouldn't be worried about repaying debts. Wembley is only the beginning of a great adventure." You have to laugh.........again:D

As for those who are deemed not good enough (I agree with them all except one), Poor smouth will be in the market for some free signings, lots of them, so no need to move even;)

Have we?.........Alex Oxide-Chamberlain fits the bill surely?

Tbf, he struggles to have any grasp on footballing matters.

So she's not very good looking then, is that what you're saying?

We've had players going to Celtic, manager going to Celtic, Manager being sacked, discord between Chairman and Manager. Come on Steve, NC is right, if he had to defend his position on every little bit of tittle tattle, then he'd be slated on here for being to in our face.

Now that was a real LOL moment!

Any Saints fans out there? alpine_saint Full Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Southern Austria Posts: 12,536 Quote: Originally Posted by Gingeletiss Any Saints fans out there? Apart from me and my kids ? Probably not. We were the only ones in red-and-white when they did a short training camp over here in summer 2004 just before Sturrock got sacked and they played Blau-Weiß Linz. Was quite an uncomfortable experience. At least Claus and Antii came and said hello... Wooooooooooooooooosshhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!

He could of been unhappy, that he couldn't make the last game due to his flight being grounded. He could of been unhappy on finding out that the cheats down the road owe us £35 grand, he could of seen his rose garden blighted by greenfly. Who knows the reason, but I'd bet my last dollar, given his show of affection at Wembley, that he wasn't unhappy with Alan Pardew. He may, like thousands of fans, been sad the we fell at the last hurdle, but like most sane fans, I'd Say that he didn't expect the success we actually had this season. All this is opinion, my opinion.

You know John, you're like a faulty tap, you keep dripping on. You have a style akin to a certain Miserableoldgit, who also went on like you do, regardless of the reply's. Why should SFC respond to every poxy rumour, one I hasten to add, that you perpetuated no end. Read NC reply again, if they were to do so, they'd never get any real work done. Face it, the Echo, along with the Mail the BBC, and several posters on here, were bang out of order, and well wide of the mark.

I got home from work yesterday, and I had a parcel from Holland. I opened it, and a plastic vagina fell into my lap. 'Hello' I thought, 'someone has sent me two lips from Amsterdam'.

You'll be waiting a long time. John B doesn't deal in facts, just conjecture, rumour, and speculation. Please don't press him on this, as he has a very delicate dispossition. He went some way, in perpetuating this bullsh1t story in the first place, amongst others. It was pleasing to have this statement from NC, but it shouldn't have been neccesary. We moaned when the duck hunter kept shouting his mouth off in the press, and many on here said that the chairman should not be seen or heard. Yet here we are again, with the vocal few on here wanting him to respond to every little rumour out there. On first impressions given this last year, he has impressed me,so long may it continue. Lastly, those saying ML this and ML that. He made it clear out the outset, that NC was in charge, so why is it that some of you expect every decision to be made by him.

They were warned, go on strike, you lose this perk, they went on strike. Are we to believe, that they are now going on strike again, in protest at loosing a perk, that quite rightly they lost last time. No wonder this country is in such a bloody state, and our industry prefers to operate abroad, where they don't get this kind of sh1t.

...and you dear John,need to understand, that a rumour is not a fact. However, it doesn't stop you spreading them as if you know them to be true. You're very much like Alpine, you love a good conspiracy theory, as long as it's anti Saints. Hope this doesn't sound too rude for your delicate disposition.