trousers

Who's Fulthorpe got to take this one?

Time we got tough....

Bring on Rudi

It's not over until the muffin parade...

And in super large cine vision for the hard of seeing....(or those too lazy to click on the picture....)

Give my regards to Fulthorpe when you get there

If the Men in Black hadn't ordered the corruption of all TSF posts going back to April 2007 then we'd be able to look back and confirm it one way or t'other.

Not sure. You may be getting confused with him changing his name on here from LifeLongSaint to Cherrypip ?

Not forgetting 'Diggers' - another 'bean spiller' gone quiet of late....

Shouldn't someone from here pop over onto that Cherries forum to say "hello from all at TSW" (nee TSF) to our dear departed friend....for old times sake....?

Just listened. Good stuff. Cheers

Is it just me or does Mr Fulthorpe bear a passing resemblance to Mr Lowe? (not counting the earlobes of course which are blatantly different)

And, as if by magic, the 20 posts following my insightful analysis above only serve to prove my point. Nice one Trousers. You're the man of reason and we all hail the footpath of integrity upon which you trudge.

Cheers! Apologies for the dotting of i's and crossing of t's. I've never quite managed to shake off winning the UK and Ireland allcomers Cluedo championship in 1983. Waddingtons have got a lot to answer for if you ask me. That said, it has been the minor details that have tripped up some infamous herring rouges down the years....HMR and her 20 minute flight from Sweden to Berlin rings a bell! (not that I'm comparing you to a ginger American chap pretending to be a woman with an IP mask on the beach of course...!)

Depends what the definition of 'private' is I guess? Most of my 'private' funds are held by 'public' companies.....in bank accounts, ISAs, Shares, etc....

I will bet on us staying up if Fulthorpe tips us to do so....

The 'trouble' with internet message boards is that 'rogue' posters and 'genuine' posters often come across in the same way. So it's a 'no win' for anyone who wants to be 100% sure they're dealing with a 'genuine' poster over a 'rogue' poster. I've lost count of the number of times on here over the last 18 months that we've had people saying to lay off supposed 'genuine' posters only for it to transpire they were in fact 'rogue' posters. So, from past experience, there's as much justification to suspect that this thread is 'genuine' as there is to suspect it might be 'rogue'. That's all.