trousers

Only 76% conservative for me. Thought it would be much higher given how much common sense I've been blessed with.

"Carlisle are still in the bottom half of the table and probably a bit worried about getting enough points to stay up and are scrapping for their lives", said the manager of a team also in the bottom half and only 8 points ahead of said strugglers....

Cheers for the analysis Ashtead Saint. One thing though..... I can't work out if it means good or bad news (for them, or us nutjobs)!

You missed out ideological arsonists. Otherwise, spot on.

http://talksport.com/football/southampton-could-lose-mane-portuguese-giants-plot-summer-swoop-150401141806

The MR01 forms for the outstanding charges show that all 3 of them are between PFC and the PFA, although Portsmouth City Council and South Point Finance are also listed as 'interested parties' underneath the PFA on charge no. 0794003350004. I'm sure this is all insignificant and doesn't mean that there is any underlying "debt"..... Just curious as to why the charges still exist.

Its a close run thing between what is most predictable: the 'Torygraph' (clever play-on-words chortle) printing an article about job creators being anti-Labour or the inevitable reaction from the mouth-frothing anti-Tory brigade. Too close to call

I'll happily take the 3 points. I didn't rate it that highly myself

Have some respect. It's taken me years of meticulous practice to get this bad.

Teacher who hates Gove to teacher who secretly doesn't: "What do you think of Gove?" Teacher who secretly doesn't hate him but doesn't want his colleague to know that for fear of being ostracised: " Gove? He's a **** of course, we all know that, don't we comrades?"

http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/9466172/the-teachers-who-quietly-miss-michael-gove/

http://www.omrlp.com/

Cheers benjii. Do you know whose responsibility it is to request the removal of the charges? i.e. Would it be Pompey or the PFA in this instance? If it's the club that requests the removal, I wonder why they requested it for the other 2 charges to be removed (in September 2014) but not these 3...?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rteww8eyplQ

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/foodanddrink/10517718/Food-banks-the-unpalatable-truth.html

If Pompey can do it with parachute payments I'm sure there's nothing wrong with Labour re-allocating the same money for multiple purposes either....they come from the same school of financial management afterall

I'm still confused why 'Portsmouth Community Football Club Limited' still have 3 charges (all attributable to the PFA) showing as outstanding at Companies House when they've been debt-free (sic) for 6 months now. Any finance gurus out there who can shed some light on this? Cheers

£468 http://www.tesco.com/groceries/product/details/?id=264155625

I doubt it

My pleasure sir. Anytime

http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/5841#.VRqVMPnF8rU http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/politics-government/ten-myths-about-margaret-thatcher/ Aaaaand, cue pap.....

Hey! Whataboutery is my job on here thank you very much ma'am!

Indeed. However, the Tories are more pro- 'make-the-constituencies-an-even-size' than Labour. Granted, there's a valid argument for saying FPTP isn't the fairest system in the world but, given its what we've got, how about we make it as fair as possible (within the confines of the system)? Just a thought.