Toadhall Saint

Totally agree with all of that but until judgement is passed none of us know what they see as a deterrent

We have 2 charges against us. We could receive 200k for the first and more fir the d second.

I’m not sure why some can’t see this. We are the precedent that precedent needs to be a deterrent to others.

It’s the club not individual. Any individual punishment would come from the FA later.

Could be but that wasn’t the impression I got watching it. Either way hopefully we find out from him soon.

Fair? Or just nice?

I got shouted down yesterday for suggesting the “punishment” will need to act as a deterrent for other clubs - so agreed we will (unfortunately) be made an example of - just depends where that bar is set ie is it seen as being proportionate.

Easier to blame everyone else and deflect from the clubs short comings which, Gibbon sorry Gibbo has overseen. Would have helped if they had been able to keep hold of the manager that had them in 2nd and challenging Cov.

Now where have I heard that before 🤔

So a potential appellant is asking for due process to be “hurried up” hmmm not sure that would happen.

Why keep repeating yourself - doesn’t make it more valid 😉

Tonda seemed to want to have his say in fact seemed frustrated that he couldn’t doesn’t smack me as someone who is guilty.

Watch out you’ll have the proportionate police on you. After all poor old Pompey ( not sure what they have to do with it) can’t afford 500k as it’s 2% of there turnover.

Day of days

I do not want to see us royally fucked I’m just pointing out that they are setting a precedent and that 300k would be a walk in the park to most champ teams given that it’s less than 10 weeks wages for one player. So I’m trying to gauge what would be proportionate is that ok with you?