Give it to Ron

Exactly what I said about Paterson who I rate but think after the United game will have been set back months. Like Gobern were far too inexperienced to be thrown in and needed nurturing a bit more. We have some very good young players but to totally rely on them this season was madness.

The usual factors are the wind or sun in the keepers eye but dont think either are a factor at SMS so wondered why we always seem to defend the Northam second half

You sleep in the Chapel as well....I bet you dont get as many tartan blankets and thermos flasks as us uber fans in the Kingsland.

Does it really matter at professional level? I have often thought that we chose to kick the wrong way so that in the second half the away team kick towards their own fans - sort of suck the ball up our end. No facts or figures to back this up but wondered what everyone else thought? With Swansea selling their allocation will this give them more impetus second half?

Depends if the management release enough from the weekly squad budget to afford them both bearing in mind that we have a match on Tuesday...can we afford 2 win bonuses?

BWP on the right Skacel on the left. McLaggon as understudy.....Smith left back.....in the changing rooms.

Based on the last performance where he never tackled in the whole game or even got his shirt dirty I think we need a bit more steel in the middle than Morgan offers at the moment. I know Wotton is not everyones cup of tea but Wotton and Euell in the centre against Sheff Utd would be worth a go to combat their different style than Swansea.

That would be the team I would pick.

Well the current masterplan under your idol is really working well isn't it! Lower gates, shocking squad of the poorest quality we have had, alienated and rampaging fan base . Yes we would of lost the loanees you mentioned but would Pearson of brought in lesser quality than what we have now ? Only Pericard was a waste but I can see why he brought him in as we were lacking height and a big striker. How do you know Pearson would of struggled...exactly you dont and you use that every time to disguise the fact that this Dutch experiment is a complete farce. I do not hold up Pearson as a god and we only won 3 but only lost 3 as well. He did not have the benefit of a pre-season like this Dutch joke of your idol. Like I said I want all 3 out of the club but at least under Crouch he put right the Dodd/Gorman farce this lot again followed the same mistake for a 4th time!

One of the most sensible posts I have read on here lately IMO and totally concur. I asked the other day for a Luvvie to name one thing that he has done since his return that has been successful and the silence was deafening. Ok maybe that we actually haven't gone into admin yet but is that more to do with aviva/Barclays not wanting to pull the plug? The thing that angers me most was loaning Stern John and then bringing the likes of Gasmi who is no better than anything else we have at the club and is very, very lightweight and added to Pulis, Robertson, Pekhart is absurd.

With that I totally agree and until all 3 are banished from Saints for good then we will still be in the ****e. Of all 3 I want Wilde out far more than any other though.

So the home game against Bristol City was empty?

Exactly and that is where most of this mess came from not Crouch but Wilde and the execs he brought in. Yet he gets away scot free and all the focus gets put onto Lowe and Crouch. Wilde has a lot to answer for and changing sides like his underpants has got us even further into a mess with this joke of a board.

Because we would have bigger gates = more revenue = less pressure from the bank. The only way we would get bigger gates is by winning and we would not of started the season with a stupid Dutch experiment wasting what little revenue we had on 5 loans who are so poor cant get in ahead of 17 year olds. Pretty simple really if look at it from the middle ground - I want all 3 out but this current board are a joke and a mess.

Found this the other day....slander niot libel and worth taking to court? http://www.simkins.co.uk/ebulletins/lerSlandernotLibel.aspx

Um Nottingham Forest....all positive all up for it and a reasonable atmosphere at the start...only problem was the team and manager were not...again! For the umpteenth time...the situation we are in is not of the fans making...how many games have the crowd had the audacity to boo and shout at the players, manager and board...2!!! We have won 1 in 14 where was all this inspiration in the other 12 then when we did our part. Ignore all this its the fans etc that is for the Luvvies trying to cover up where the real problem lies and its not the fan this time.

Bambi on acid....watched him a few times for the reserves. When we released him we were in the Prem and he was not anywhere near the standard at that time.

Thats the thing mate they don't realise we have been there and done it when these 12 year olds were still in their nappies. Being chased round Elland Rd in 79 when there are only 200 fellow Saints amongst 38k Leeds baying for your blood was certainly an experience. I couldn'tr care less how a fan supports the team - you pay your money you can do what you like. Where I sit in the Kingsland its ideal...good bunch of knowledgable fans, all join in the singing and a good distance from the burberry clad lot.

I consider the Northam to be full of 12 year old chavs....this generalisation game is great isn't it! Thanks for confirming everything I thought about you.

Sorry but do you not contradict yourself with the bold bits above - he certainly tried to reduce the debts with Skacel and Rasiak wages - something that angered me greatly at the time. I totally agree with the last bit - Wilde is just as much to blame here as Lowe and gets off far too lightly IMO.

Yet you support Lowe? why? can you name me anything that has been successful since he came back and had another go at ruining the club? My position is as always I want the 3 gone forever but cannot see how anyone can support Lowe and Wilde what do they bring?

Again I will respond - there has been total support in 12 of the 14 games only Forest and Doncaster has seen anything like a reaction against the board, manager or players. Do you think there would of been any protests had we won more or a managerial tactical decision that worked and not from planet Burley? As stated in another post the luvvies will always use the fans or class war when they are trying to deflect the blame.

Quote: Originally Posted by John B View Post But Crouch's one main advantage is that he is not called Rupert There we have it in 2 posts an example of when the Luvvies run out of ammunition its either a) blame the fans b) bring the class war into it. Pathetic.

Its the siege mentality we all have now....we have had so much ****e to contend with this season especially with our loanees that its the norm to expect them to be crap. When was the last time we had anything good happen here.....the last game of last season for me and that was then ripped apart in favour of a joke experiment.