Sheaf Saint

Not true. We're deriding him for being such a bellend that he went and broke a law that he was already on a suspended sentence for breaking previously, and in doing so caused the very real possibility of mistrial which could have seen the defendants walk free on a technicality. If he really, genuinely cared about bringing those men to justice for their actions then he would have stayed well away. But his actions betray his real agenda, which is to stoke up as much anti-islamic hatred as he possibly can. I'm no authoritarian and I don't want to see him and his ilk silenced. I want to see them given the opportunity to spout their bigoted bile and nonsense because, as both he and his Britain First contemporaries Golding and Fransen have shown, give them enough rope and they will hang themselves. These people are not the brave free speech warriors that some are trying to make them out to be. They are violent, hate-filled morons who fail to see the irony in the fact that they constantly call for immigrants to respect our laws but they can't respect them themselves. And by the way, following your assertion that he was only convicted of fraud because of his beliefs - are you suggesting that he did not get a fair trial because of media bias? There are laws against that you know

Chronic

Conscious

Aw, poor little Tommy is just misunderstood is he? He's a convicted thug who appeals to ignorance, bigotry and hatred to gain support for his far-right cause. If he isn't a neo-nazi monster then he's doing a very passable impression of one. FFS the guy is so pathetic that he recently staged an attack on himself outside Macdonalds and posted the video online so he could paint himself out to be the poor victim.

https://thesecretbarrister.com/2018/05/25/what-has-happened-to-poor-tommy-robinson/ I also found this bit in the final paragraph of that article very interesting... No prizes for guessing which of these categories Hypo falls into.

What do you think of the fact that the grooming gang might now walk free due to his actions? The guy is total f*cking idiot who blatantly broke the strict non-reporting rules that exist for a very good reason. Do you think he should be exempt from that law?

Balm

You sure about that bit?

In fairness though, we all know that MP wasn't our first or possibly even second choice. If we had got the man we really wanted then it would have undoubtedly been wrapped up much sooner.

Double

Nut

Box

I imagine Newcastle fans still call it St James' Park, as that is what it has always been regardless of what their chairman wants to call it. As for the others (and you can also include Bolton and Huddersfield in this list in that their new grounds only ever had a commercial sponsors name since they opened) - I genuinely feel sorry for fans of those clubs in this respect. We nearly had the same situation when Lowe announced that it would be called the Friends Provident stadium, only for a fan backlash to get them to add the St Marys bit which then became the obvious name for us to adopt. As someone has already posted - it doesn't matter what sponsorship deals the club does and what the media decide to call it, to us it will only ever be St Marys.

I think you're forgetting Chelsea. I would say there's a better than 50% chance that they will part with Conte one way or another this summer.

1988/89 - we went 23 games without a win under Chris Nicholl, who kept his job until the summer of 1991.

93:31 according to bet365. Only supposed to be 3 mins added on. How many goals have we conceded in extended stoppage time this season?

Stoke get a third! Edit: maybe not then.it flashed up 3-1 on bet365

Spurs 5-4 Leicester!

There's always next year

Nice one Crouchie!

Doing a perfect job of controlling the tempo and preventing City from playing with any intensity so far. They look like they are already on the beach to me.

Swansea 1-0

http://streamsshooter.gq/wiz/wiz2.php

Any decent streams?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7CC5aX8OzOIl New single out today. New album due in September.