Webby

As I said, I'm not comparing him to Le Tiss. Come on, you get my point right?

I'm not comparing him to Le Tiss but you could apply those same words to Le Tiss too. Matty wasn't great every game.

They're probably assuming but sky sports report the fee to be around 1.8m.

His birthday this weekend.

Distance never been a problem.

But look at Stoke's squad, especially up front. Jones, Fuller, Walters, Crouch, Jerome, Pennant, Sidibe.

Let's give thanks to Ikea too. Obviously played it's part.

Brilliant!

Is sharp good enough for the prem? Is hooper good enough for the prem? Is so and so good enough for the prem? Was ormerod good enough for the prem? Did we rate Kevin Davies when he was with us? Is andy carroll good enough for Liverpool? A resounding no! FPMSL £35m!! Kenny, what were you thinking?

know youre trying to reduce your waiting time but I don't think you'll find that the first team players and staff are involved in transfer negotiations.

In ikea? Hasn't Cortese got his own office?

Hooper starts today.

Fee accepted means nothing if he wants 25k a week. We're not gonna pay it. BUT, if we go up, then he can expect a nice wage rise. If he's happy with that then it might happen.

If we're not looking for cb then I wanna know why. Martin was shocking last night. Then again we were shocking in every department last night. This blip in form is now a slump, make no bones about it.

I can't see that happening at all. Edit. But if was to go out on loan and score a winning goal against west ham then that would be ok

This isn't a fair comparison because the Scottish league is smaller than the english league and the 2 glasgow teams will inevitably 'take' fans away from the smaller clubs. Instead, take 2 prem league clubs from the same city with similar average attendances to rangers and Celtic. Then, work out the distance of the radius of the clubs in the spl using glasgow as the centre and apply that to the 2 prem teams that you just chose. Then see what league teams are in your radius and what their attendances are.

Why is that people think that player A that cost XX amount is, or should be, better than player B who cost X amount? It's just a valuation that was made and paid at that particular time for whatever reason. The only thing to ask is could we serve ourselves better by getting 2 or 3 players for the same amount that this 1 might cost.

Based on what, their attendances? I'll bet Liverpool have more fans.

There's no way Cahill would leave everton.

No chance.

Celtic, 4m may be derisory, but we're just testing yer resolve. Bid low, then work up. You know how it works, come on.

The best time to strengthen is when you're top. If you can improve your side when you're top then you're really onto something and psychologically, it says a lot to our rivals. Put it this way, when you're 1-0 up you want to score a second goal right? You don't want to consolidate and settle for 1-0 cos there's always that chance of being caught.

I now have " this channel was banned" on the vipbox stream

Come on stream!

He's useless Guly