View From The Top

Apart from Soton that is, or did you miss that fact?

I trust this bunch of tories to do the right thing even less than I do the current government and that's saying something! This isn't '79 and Mr "One is an ordinary chap" is deffo no Thatcher.

I've changed my hue as I feel the Liberals now represent my political views better than Labour do. In addition I despise Brown with a passion and always have done. I can, however, rule out ever voting tory as I'm from the Nye Bevan school of thought about them.

Nothing to do with interest rates then?

1992 Nov 7.00 % - 1.00 % Oct 8.00 % - 1.00 % Sep 9.00 % - 1.00 % May 10.00 % - 0.50 % 1991 Sep 10.50 % - 0.50 % Jul 11.00 % - 0.50 % May 11.50 % - 0.50 % Apr 12.00 % - 0.50 % Mar 12.50 % - 0.50 % Feb 13.00 % - 1.00 % 1990 Oct 14.00 % - 1.00 % 1989 Oct 15.00 % 1.00 % May 14.00 % 1.00 % I found them for you comrade Bognor. Now, what were you saying about interest rates not going through the roof?

Corps doesn't seem his chipper self today. Unemployment is really taking its toll.

I've never said the 80s comrade as you well know. Try the 90s, say from 1990 - 1993. I'm willing to bet you'll find a 15% in there. See you don't mention house repossessions in there. Perhaps they didn't happen either. You're not very good at this today. Good edit Comrade Bognor.

I viewed it as "Storrie is fooked here".

One will do ones best.

Has anyone had any yet? I have just had a Labour one at my door. Unfortunately he was a scouser. Didn't see any at all last general election

No sh it? Difference is, most of them are reasonably bright and not a NF rally attending neo-nazi.

You have ginger in your user name do you not? Therefore the term ginger was used in that context. Hardly my fault your touchy on the subject. Secondly you didn't answer the question set, one that yourself alluded to. Whilst I accept your view on your happy life the simple, undeniable fact, one that you want to forget, is that interest rates and home repossessions went through the roof on the Tory watch. Accept it and deal with it.

Dune, stop being a trolling mong please so I don't have to put you on block.

AA is slighty, how should I say it? Ah yes, dodgy, with previous...

IIRC foreigners can't own property in Thailand in the way we understand it. Or I maybe on drugs.

PM Corky Morris if you want to know about owning property in Florida as he has 3 places out there. In fact he's flying out there tomorrow which means I've got to drive to the match. :mad:

I for love am loving your long slow death. Thank you for the entertainment and long may it continue.

Not you, eck and the other intelligent posters.

Nice try comrade, but not that good. Now how about the interest rates that you are missing or would they just emphasise my point? Of course they would which is why you didn't show them. Maybe the sky high interest rates and home repossessions have just been wiped from the collective neo-fascist memory as they never fook anything up do they? As I also said, I don't comment on the 70s in the same way I don't comment on the 60s or 50s as I have no personal experience of them outside of short trousers but I accept they were pants.

In that case they are soooooo screwed.

Comrade Bogner, if you look at the question I pose to our ginger friend it was a direct challenge to his statement about high interest rates and home repossessions since 1997. Now we both know that during the Major years both interest rates and home repossessions went through the roof and for our ginger friend to suggest similar post 97 is wrong and plain daft. Just accept the fact that up to the banking crisis (which I believe we agree upon) that interest rates and inflation were under control by a Labour government. The continual denial of the fact makes you all look a tad daft. As for pre '79 I really can't comment as I was only a nipper but I accept that it was generally cr@p and the unions were way to powerful.

Am I correct is saying that regardless of the CVA the FL will demand that all footballing debts are paid in full or it is minus points?

Because they weren't clearly tongue in cheek were they?

Consider it a statement of fact.

Railtrack was effectively renationalised IIRC but it could be argued that the railways were a nationalisation too far anyway.