hypochondriac

Not sure anyone was.

Sigh.

Those are the two threads I have mentioned above, both of which were confined to two posters. I don't agree that 'many' are hinting at drastic action. I don't see that evidence and as for the Capello thread, every poster on there is either calling him or laughing at him. I don't think anyone disagrees with you- or anyone that does is in a very small minority. I think there is a danger here of overreacting to what are really one or two comments from a small minority of posters.

Where? There is one thread discussing our poor form and how it reflects on Adkins (not something I agree with really but each to their own) and another discussing Capello as manager clearly started by a simpleton. There is no meltdown. The only meltdown has occurred primarily in the mind of the poster who started this thread and those that agree with him. Oh and thanks for agreeing

Although clearly that is just a moronic one or two.

I can't say I have looked myself. We were in relegation form previously, and I was really referring to the poster who mentioned the relegation form thing. Swap the word relegation for poor and the point still stands. With regards the rest of your post, I largely agree. I'm not actually unduly worried at the moment, especially with Sharp where I think we did very well in the transfer window. All I was saying was that if people are disappointed or worried then I can see where they are coming from. It doesn't mean that they aren't true supporters or that they need to calm down. A win against Burnely though is really needed to get some momentum back.

Is anyone asking to get rid of him? Really? Clearly that is a silly thing to say. I think he may need to look at his approach and see if it needs changing to get us over the line, but clearly there is no possible reason to see him sacked.

It's posts like that which are just silly and don't actually attempt to debate anything.

Not sure what you mean by 'barking on.' If you mean pointing out that we have been in relegation form for quite a while then I really don't see the problem in pointing it out. No one wants it to be the case, but it is a fact. I haven't seen many posters asking for Adkins to be sacked, but if there have been any, I would suggest they are in a very small minority and clearly saying something like that is ridiculous. Wondering whether Adkins has been found out a bit isn't the same thing though and I think something like that is worth discussing even if I'm not sure if I necessarily agree. It's perfectly possible to get behind the team but at the same time expressing frustration at our lack of form. The club are not impervious to criticism.

I bet he would you know. Would be amazing but they will probably appoint Harry. Feckers.

Idiotic thread.

Was on the OS and there was a thread about it last week.

No other option in other people's minds.

Pretty sure some people are just a bit disappointed at our really poor run of form after an excellent start. Nothing wrong with expressing that. Yes I would have been happy with our position at the beginning of the season, but if you had asked me the same at the beginning of November then I would say I would be a bit disappointed that we had allowed all the other teams to catch us up. Still reckon we will give it a good go and hope to finish at least playoffs for a successful season. Seventh or below would be extremely disappointing now though.

Saggy face will be boss now

Ffs. England job for him

Would like to point out that I posted this last week...

I'm in corporate again so add one on

Not that bothered as I can still ignore him. It's if he gets the England job that I won't know what to do. That would be awful.

In some ways Suarez is unlucky then that he wasn't prosecuted! In that case the FA would be powerless to deal with him and his case would look shaky on a beyond reasonable doubt basis.

He will get off and become the next England manager. Not sure I will be able to stand that...

Are you implying that royalists are unable to do so?

A verdict that Suarez disputes. by the video evidence it is clear that Terry said the offensive words, what is in dispute is if he said it as an insult rather than saying that isn't what he said. Not much difference in my mind. (does the fact that criminal proceedings have been brought mean the FA are unable to do their own independent investigation based on probability? Or are they prohibited from doing so?)

I prefer the running of the wasp.

I actually think it was Wong to handle the terry and Suarez affair so differently. It wasn't actually proven, it was done on the basis of probability unlike Terry's case.