hypochondriac

But these issues were raised months ago and were just rejected.

Very true. I know that at least 2 (maybe three can't remember) mods/admin agree on this point.

I thought much the same. Every thread on the subject just descends into people taking the mickey. Bit sad IMO.

In the past there have been comments along the lines of "We are allowing you to use this site, it belongs to us." Just saying that this will undoubtedly changed now that we are all paying a fiver.

No reply?

Neither.

On average, we now get about 5 posts on the lounge per hour. It used to be much higher and thus the forum as a whole was a lot more interesting. It's quite sad.

There was certainly a lot lot more posts when it was just banter. As I said, the * rule worked well IMO.

So no then.

Yet one more person completely ignoring what I said. Did I say "Mclaggon is useless"? Or did I say he was useless yesterday? Two completely different things.

So now apart from the original poster not one person has sad he was excellent. I know who I would have my money on as someone who "Was watching a different game."

Why because you think a player plays badly in one game does that automatically mean that you think they are rubbish and being too negative?

Would you consider the third option in the poll?

I saw . I doubt very much that they would give me the power though. It gets very boring doing work sometimes and the arcade is a bit of a laugh! Anyway back on topic, having skimmed through the post match reaction thread, the marks for Mclaggon are 4,2,3,2,3,4. So it seems that you are in fact the minority and must have been watching a different game to the majority.

Thank you.

If you read people who hav rated the players in the post match reaction, most have given him a 5 or below (someone has given him a 2.)

And did I say that? Please read the posts properly before making yourself look silly. If I had said "he is useless" then you may have had a point.

I would argue that their achievements are roughly similar. Thing is he left Portsmouth in a much better position than when he got them and I bet you he does the same with Leicester. Where on earth will Rupes leave us?

Eh? He was useless yesterday!

The crucial difference is that Milan is prepared to invest his own money, something Lowe has never done.

And if you there was a poll I would imagine that most people would say the same thing. Personally I would prefer the forum maybe to have a few problems on the odd game with no subscriptions than to have them.

I really agree with you. I rarely visit things like the hardware forum but I visit the lounge and the saints forum quite a few times a day. On the odd occassion that I have visited one of the other forums I sometimes find posts that I could have helped with but sometimes they are over a week old or longer. It was why S4E was so popular because it was MORE than a saints forum. Thing is nobody ever asks the posters what they would like, it's just assumed.

I agree with that. The old way of putting a * in a post that was serious seemed to be working well.

Oh FFS Alpine are you incapable of having a debate with someone without resorting to insults?

And TBH the server reliability issues (which was the main reason people paid their money in the first place.) Seem to be generally comparable to the old server, which makes me wonder why I bothered to pay.