hypochondriac

Correct but I was thinking maybe it was a genuine good faith reading of my post and not just another seque into being argumentative for the sake of it and wilfully missing the point. Let's see.

You misunderstand. The contention is that if there are reports in the media that we are interested, fabrice seems to be suggesting that these reports are not true or made up. He also uses examples of where there have been reports that we were interested in a player who then doesn't sign as proof of some of these made up reports. The reality of course is that we have interests in multiple players for the same position and so obviously we aren't going to sign more than one player to fill one role or position. Maehle for instance we probably were interested in as was widely reported but we ended our interest once we signed up kwp. Not signing a player is not proof that articles or journalists have invented stories of our interest.

Exactly. Absolutely head mental to think that just because we haven't signed every player that we are potentially interested in that somehow we never had any interest in any of them.

Can't see it myself.

Who are these people who "work in our recruitment team?" Because I actually know people who work at the club and I know for a fact that we had interest in McKennie.

Lol. You don't have a clue. We were interested in McKennie. What a load of tosh.

Doesn't really explain why we haven't seen a photo though. In fact it makes it more suspicious. No reason they couldn't have knocked up a photo of him holding a shirt and then no one would be asking questions. Curious.

Yes that seems more realistic for me. If Adams achieves that then he will have been a success.

A hatful from ings and 12-15 from Adams would be unreal and would most likely see us in Europe. I'm not sure I can see it myself but it would be amazing.

I'm not sure he's better than Mccarthy either but that isn't what I said tbf.

Interesting. I think Mccarthy and Forster competing for the gk spot if forster has sorted out his head is an improvement on Mccarthy and gunn.

Sorry I've lost patience. Really hope you can fix it and I'm sure it's frustrating but I'm going to post elsewhere for a while.

Yes we are but if juve want him then he will obviously go there.

It's not that surprising is it? We have an embarrassment of riches in that area and he was the standout player in a pretty awful team that stayed up by the skin of their teeth.

The other thing is we have thousands of shirts with the old sponsor that are now worthless.

Who would you sue though? Would be pretty difficult, do they even have a physical address?

I'm told now that we did receive the first 7.5 million but nothing after that so could have been worse and at least we've got a replacement.

Think he just wants rid of us ASAP.

It just makes me proud to even be mentioned in the same breath as those luminaries.

Possibly I don't actually know. You'd think there would have been some sort of opposition though rather than meek acceptance.

But if it allows us to plug a gaping hole in the finances to keep some backroom staff in a job then I'd think it was worth it for a year.

From what I was told they have left saints tens of millions down and I'm not sure if they've paid them anything at all. Almost amusing how badly saints have played this one with what was very clearly a dodgy outfit from the start.

Is it currently open does anyone know?

I'm still claiming it as itk.

Ings and jwp should be called up. The rest won't get in.