hypochondriac

You said that you didn't understand why fans expected us dominate every game and that we have very entitled fans. I don't understand who you are talking about as I haven't seen anyone expecting us to dominate every game and if anything I think the expectations of our fans are too low and we let the team and owners get away with too much.

You're just a troll at this point. We haven't played it at any point under this manager.

I get he has to be diplomatic given his role but you can tell from going home with Adam and Jo that he thinks it's crazy we haven't played it earlier.

Are we this years Luton?

Jo has actually been calling it as it is for weeks now. Some people called him negative, he's actually spot on.

Calling for his sacking would suggest you aren't happy with the performances. Other posters who are similarly unhappy with performances aren't entitled for saying that.

Only took him the entire game and absolutely fucking it up!

Because almost no one is expecting us to dominate every team. What they object to is performances like this and pathetic results like loss to Oxford and Norwich.

Those entitled fans though eh?

Just fuck off. I can't believe some cretins still defend it.

Genuinely undecided about whether I am going to watch the derby or not.

TBF we did get Martin who I don't like but at least had some experience. I'm at that point again where it's not the worst thing in the world if we get a few thrashing so we can go nuts at the twattish owners for how we are run.

Don't worry lads. If we'd played four at the back we would have conceded even more...

This is just embarrassing. In truth we shouldn't have appointed this manager. Despite what a minority says on here nothing will convince me that we should play three at the back. I'm not sure where we go from here. We aren't going to sack Tonda and admit a mistake. The best we can hope for now is to write off the season and try again with a more experienced man next year.

A good advert for championship football.

A bizarre opinion in my view. We've bought some of the best attacking players in the division. The likes of Scienza, Fellows and to a lesser extent Azaz and Armstrong would get in most teams in the division. You'd expect the top teams in the prem to be near the top of the league. With our resources and parachute payments we should be higher than we are and it's not entitled to expect that. In my view the bizarre attitude is to think that lower mid table is acceptable.

Really poor defending again. Boro waste the chance but we give it to them too easily.

Right and the subsequent chunk of games when teams worked us out and the gaps between midfield and attack became too big, Scienza started not playing out wide and Fellows became less effective, have we looked to change things?

How many games have we played with 2 cbs under this manager?

Not sure you talk to but a number of people I talk to irl have brought up us playing so defensively whilst not winning games.

We only waaaant four defenders waaaant four defenders. We're walking along singing a song moaning at the club for playing five.

You got me. I just post on here for a laugh.

3 at the back and you fucked it up. Why the fuck do we play 3? Why the fuck do we play 3? We want 4 at the back say we want 4 at the back

Is he even a Saints fan?

I'm glad you're amused.