hypochondriac

I think modern society and mutually assured destruction can achieve that in the future without the EU.

Disagree. I hope for an EU collapse and then a close trading bloc between separate countries which doesn't involve ever closer political union.

I'd be alright with the rayner one tbf. In other news, long-Bailey is the front runner in the latest poll. Could end Labour for a generation...

As usual you're talking complete bilge. I barely know who Katie Hopkins is, I haven't uttered her name outside of this forum since she was on celebrity big brother about ten years ago. I barely gave her a second thought till you brought her up on here. You seem intent in bringing her up on multiple occasions. Like I said it's a bit weird.

Probably not but luckily we don't have to find out and have good memories of their loyalty to our small provincial club and their skill.

I've barely mentioned either of them, you're the one who keeps referring to them (that's the third time you've brought them up this year so far.) it's a really bizarre obsession you have with them.

Yes but the problem arises because someone isn't a racist just because you call them one. It's pretty rich for someone like you to pretend this forum is just a bit of a laugh and telling people to chill out when you've been throwing around terms like racist at posters you disagree with.

Not to hand but during the election results analysis John curtice was talking about it.

The age of the average tory voter has lowered significantly.

Not sure we should take your definition of right as gospel given your history.

Do the bnp even exist anymore? Why are they caring about a Labour leadership candidate?

Well you obviously thought it was a good thing considering you tried to use it as evidence to challenge the claim that corbyn wasn't credible.

That's because Johnson was a much better candidate than Corbyn. I know it pains you but that's the truth.

B*llocks.

If you think a change of slogan would have made the difference then you're deluded. Corbyn simply wasn't credible.

I think people who like football will prevail.

It doesn't matter how many times you repeat the same thing, the consensus amongst actual fans and people within the game is that it's not working as it is and they will most likely change it at the end of the season thank goodness.

If you are a senior figure in a sovereign regime as you put it, are you incapable of being a terrorist in your view? Serious question. Also, what would have been a warranted response in your mind to attacks on the US embassy, attacks on oil tankers and attacks on drone strikes?

​I don't think it was pointless at all. His reasoning may have been dodgy, we can't know for sure, but it certainly wasn't pointless.

That's because he was a terrorist. Quite clearly. Your only argument that he wasn't seems to be that he was part of the Theocratic Iranian regime. By the same token there's no debating this matter with you. You're convinced thaat Soleimani was not a terrorist and swallow whole everything you read to villify his killing. There you go again, making a ludicrous false equivalence between how the USA and Iran treats it's own people. Has the US government been literally gunning down protestors in the streets? Your hate for Trump and Western actions generally makes you sound deranged. There is literally no equivalence between how America treats its citizens and Assad who the Iranians have propped up or the Iranian people. You can think Trump is a complete buffoon but that doesn't mean you should swallow the horsesh*t.

No I'm making reference to expert opinion from people who actually know what they are talking about. I'd rather publicise the views of knowledgeable people on the subject lest you think I'm just making it all up from a place of ignorance. Just because these people post on twitter doesn't make them any less legitimate. You're just annoyed because it flies in the face of your progressive anti-western narrative.

"Trump's inaction after numerous Iranian attacks throughout 2019- against regional oil tankers, a US drone, Saudi Aramco and the US embassy in Iraq- led Khamenei to believe understandably that trump was all bluster. Khamenei's open taunting of trump was a miscalculation." The assassination of a terrorist was legally justified on this basis alone, regardless if they are working for the Iranian regime or not. The weird moral equivalence that some in the West give to the likes of Iran is just bizarre.

Are you serious? The individual responsible for one of the largest mass killings of Muslims is not in any way comparable to Dominic Raab and yes I will keep quoting informed twitter sources because they are relevant to the conversation:

But knowing saints it will be loaning out Adams with no replacement and then ings will get injured in February.

What possible reason would we have to loan out Adams with an option to buy? Loaning him out anyway is mad.