-
Posts
40,500 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by hypochondriac
-
In sort of a morbid curiosity sort of way I'm kind of interested to see how man city will mangle us in a few weeks.
-
Onuachu Archer Fraser Downes Lallana/Fernandes Dibling Would give us more a goal threat than we've had so far.
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
hypochondriac replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
"it's called integrity,weve not seen it for a while." lol. -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
hypochondriac replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Guardian, 7 July 2024: "The grownups are back in Westminster. The Tory psychodramas inside No 10 have been replaced by a serious Labour government focused on delivery. It’s going to take time for all of us to make the adjustment..." Aged like milk that... -
Ironically that was one of our best performances of the season which probably tells you why we are getting relegated. I'll take the positives of Archer getting a good goal which will help with his confidence. It feels to me like the next game will decide Martin's fate. Onuachu has been shamefully sidelined wheb he looks like he deserves a chance at the very least.
-
This may be a bold prediction but there's no chance this finishes with us on a clean sheet. Playing this way is suicidal and it feels like only a matter of time. We have been no threat at all. I predict this ends 3-0 and Marton uses the first half as evidence that his style of play works when imo it suggests the opposite.
-
How is playing like this-particularly against the big boys- in any way superior to an ultra defensive hit them on the back quick transitions style? I must be seeing something quite different to Martin.
-
Our style of play is utterly retarded. 0% chance we can play 90 minutes like this with no goal threat and not concede multiple times when we get tired. Madness.
-
All signs point to us getting thrashed and the decision to play Manning in a Premier league match will be widely mocked.
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
hypochondriac replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Well done for calling it out. Like you say it's wrong no matter what party engages in it. Hopefully there can be more clearly defined boundaries because asking them to mark their own homework isn't working. -
Do they punch themselves in the face?
-
Well yes but I've never seen a black person described as a neo nazi. I wasn't even aware that was possible.
-
Isn't that man black?
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
hypochondriac replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
I think people will care. Does anyone remember the journalists shouting at Johnson asking how many children he has? -
Good to see Sam Gallagher getting a goal against the skates.
-
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
hypochondriac replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
That would be more understandable if these people weren't already millionaires. On another note this could get interesting - understand the messenger isn't the most reliable but if it is true then surely a matter of time until it breaks. -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
hypochondriac replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Quite. Like I said they're all at it. -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
hypochondriac replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Yes you're quite correct. Nothing at all to stop companies promising things after leaving office in return for favours now. Banning freebies for pm is a gesture more than anything and would at least stop the more obvious piss takes. -
The Starmer Years - Can The New Broom Sweep Clean?
hypochondriac replied to sadoldgit's topic in The Lounge
Starmer seems to think it's acceptable to accept these donations as leader of the opposition but not as pm which is an odd stance. He also only came to this realisation today and not before he had already accepted the donations. How about setting a precedent that no prime minister accepts any donations ever. Do what you like once you leave office and coin it in for the rest of your life but no risk of undue influence whilst in power. Seems fair to me. -
Sounds like the best of some bad options to me if it plays out like that. Iran hobbled would be great.
-
It's totally irrelevant to Lighthouse's point which is that there is nothing that Israel can do that would change Iran. In a hypothetical scenario where Israel did everything you wanted it to do, Iran's stance would not change, it would still see the existence of Israel as an abomination and it would still be looking to destroy it.
-
These were the exact type of people that @whelkwas referring to earlier.
-
"what's the difference?" "Israel aren't continually lobbing thousands of rockets at Lebanon in an effort to randomly kill as many Jews as possible." "you can't look at the bigger picture" How is answering the question I was asked anything to do with looking at a bigger picture? I was asked what the difference was between the two groups and responded. Do you think there's a difference?
-
That's not the crux of the issue for Hezbollah and Hamas. Or Iran.
-
It's hilarious that you see no difference between Israel and Hezbollah.