hypochondriac

I'm assuming Onuachu is still injured. Can't see us dropping Sugawara. I'd like to see Edwards given a chance too though.

Which he clearly should have. I'd be giving Amo Ameyew MOR of a chance this year too.

Lumley Sugawara kwp Wood Stephens Manning Aribo ugachukwu Fernandes Fraser Archer Should be fun.

This game is 1-0 but might as well be 5-0 given how one sided it was.

I think before we write off all the players we would need to give another manager a go to see if they could make them look any better.

The funniest thing we did in the summer was sign Archer and BBD who had played in a team the previous year that played an entirely different brand of football and finished rock bottom.

I'm in the home end for Palace so it's not all bad. Will probably be able to celebrate a few goals.

I'm going to Fulham and palace away over the Christmas period. Not really looking forward to the football bit if it's like this which let's be honest is very likely.

Just a shame we had one season of being alright) even last year we weren't great to be honest.) dreary and rubbish crap most weeks gets very tiring.

It's not just that we lose every week, it's that we aren't even competitive. I would take being down the bottom if we were nicking the odd point and looking a match for the odd team. Even the Everton game that we somehow won we looked complete crap for most of it.

Absolutely. Completely pointless to buy him if we never play him. Would have been better off loaning him back to Peterborough for the season.

You're a cunt and a troll. Do everyone a favour and leave.

No idea if this graph is accurate but if true what the fuck were they doing?

Will be interesting to revisit this thread over the next couple of years when the first lot of questionable death stories come out and when the rules are relaxed from the expected to die within six months standard.

As predicted it passes. A very sad day.

Ah yes such a gift in the Netherlands:

Given that's the phrase you've used to describe distribution of child rape, I'm not sure I'd be trusting your judgement on that.

And apparently it wasn't the first time.

Depends if that's all it was or if there was more to come out about it.

You said a judge signing off was a "massive" safeguard despite that being disputed by an incredibly experienced judge who actually goes through the wording in the bill as it applies to judges and despite nothing in the bill addressing the overcrowding, lack of resources, the fact the judge doesn't have to meet anyone involved in the case or has to investigate the circumstances of cases (nor is there a right to appeal or to notify any next of kin.) It's not a massive safeguard.

I'm sure there will be tradeoffs with every decision. Maybe Trump and his team will trade some job losses in car manufacturing in exchange for sorting out the border.

The judge has no obligation to investigate any case, merely to rubber stamp the procedure. Remember too that this is a severely underfunded and overstretched judiciary who won't have the time to investigate even if they were required to - which they aren't.

This from Dominic Grieve highlights another point that you didn't mention: