hypochondriac

Probably better that way. I had no interest in her at all until soggy brought her up in another futile attempt to avoid discussing Islamic extremism.

It was when soggy maintained that Hopkins was likely to be a Christian because she went to a nativity her child was in and proclaimed herself the modern day Jesus christ. He was roundly derided at the time and continues to be every so often when he tries to defend those claims.

I think if you can be bothered to check the post history, it was soggy who brought all of that up. Always worth mentioning it every now and again for the comedy value.

Because that's exactly what you've done. Every time it's mentioned you start on a diatribe about evil Christians, nazis and other extremists. You seem incapable of discussing Islamic extremism and it's problems without first mentioning that there are problems with other faiths or in other areas of society. Every time. Despite not a single poster disagreeing with it. Are you naive enough to believe that a terrorist attack in Paris from Islamic state would not naturally evolve into a wider conversation about Islam? It's a message board and just because you started the thread doesn't mean you own all the content in it. The debate widened because it was always going to, not because everyone who disagrees with you is somehow racist or desperate to bash muslims as you like to believe. Again, you seem to have a real problem with discussing Islamic extremism. What possible relevance do abhorrent rapists who may be white have to do with this? That is why people accuse you of being an apologist. All the rest of the guff about muslims being responsible for all evil in the world is complete and utter rubbish invented in your own head. Again. I'm not sure what barbed comments you are referring to but I'm quite capable of calling out someone like Sour Mash when he says something Ill advised or that I disagree with and also call you out when you are being a buffoon. It's not like I have a finite number of barbed comments, you'll continue to receive my ire all the time you display your idiocy on this thread.

There are indeed many problems in the world and there are many threads on here to discuss them. This thread however began talking about the Paris attacks and then moved on to discuss the motivations behind the attack as well as the problem of Islamic extremism. Whenever it is brought up though you go off on one about how there are loads of problem everywhere, how there are Christian extremists nazis etc etc etc. Why is it so difficult to admit the problems here and discuss it without continually referring to other extremist groups and religions that no one has denied exists?

You've been very dismissive considering you haven't even seen the survey - questioning the motives of Phillips and suggesting he has hidden agendas. Maybe best to actually read the survey and what it has to say before deciding all of this. One imagines you wouldn't be urging the same degree of caution had this survey agreed with your own opinions. The amount in the survey is broadly consistent with other surveys by the way. It's simply impractical to interview every Muslim as I'm sure you would agree.

Based on our history, I would say it's fairly likely that we will be losing Mane and almost certain that Wanyama is going. 99% of things posted on here are opinion, it's called a forum...

So you'd be equally dismissive of surveys had this one come to opposite conclusions? Didn't think so...

I wonder if those dismissing this piece of work on here would be doing the same thing had the report reached the opposite conclusions? I doubt it somehow..

Stop being silly. He would have a part to play in every game if fit and weanaged to sign him. Would be quite a coup.

I can't believe people are taking my flippant remark regarding a misspelling seriously...

I got a couple of ubers tonight. The drivers had come from Portsmouth and we're loving it. I got home safely and it saved me about £4 in total which is excellent value. Highly recommended and I'll be using them again.

Oh dear oh dear soggy, you really are a simple soul. Post #3215 you are calling rapists racists.

[emoji38]read your post you imbecile.

If you read post #3215 again you may understand. Never mind.

Another whoosh moment for soggy.

Do you think a racist rapist only rapes someone they aren't racially prejudiced against?

The point is there is a disproportionately high number of convicted rapists who are Muslim. Why that is is up for debate but the problem is there, supported by your own statistics.

Where have you been?

And only 4.5% of the uk population... Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk

This is what I mean. You write something idiotic, I flag it up and then you pretend that I didn't understand what you were talking about. There was nothing to misunderstand, it was just a stupid question. Again.

Ask idiotic questions and you'll receive a barbed response. You get a lot of barbed responses from me.

Well that's just down to definitions and we clearly aren't going to agree on that one because it depends what definition you use.

Did you not say yes to the question posed in post #3114?

No i didn't read the argument. I completely ignored the last few pages and decided to post about racism for no reason.