hypochondriac

And not sure why you have to exaggerate so much. I swear what i consider to be a normal amount but when I'm out in public I try to moderate my language and topics of conversation because I understand that some people would rather I didn't do it. It isn't too difficult a task to show some consideration for others.

I see what you mean. Might as well start shouting c*nt as I walk down the street and see how long it takes to get arrested.

Nick Clegg is the most electable bloke in terms of personality and how he comes accross in the media. Shame his party and policies (and reneging on deals) make him unelectable.

As usual displaying no empathy for others. Certainly wouldn't want my two and three year old relatives listening to that.

If killing in the name of was sung in the middle of the street in broad daylight then yes. If they wanted to sing the song with the swearing left in then why not do it somewhere where the swearing is considered acceptable? Didn't expect you to agree anyway, you enjoy being deliberately obtuse.

I think his point is that there is a certain stigma to unwed teenage single mothers in this country that maybe doesn't exist over there. It's art though so he could literally mean anything.

I think they make a good point but that point would have been markedly better and more inclusive had they decided not to swear so loudly in public. Could quite easily have conveyed the message of the song without it. Agreed?

Who cares? What gives you the right to judge a kid for what they write on instagram?

To be honest you would think a bloke with millions would offer to pay some back for the cost of his child. I know I would in that situation. 1.9 million is excessive though clearly.

I wrote to hitchens once. He is an utter buffoon so I won't be reading the article, sorry.

If you actually read it it doesn't seem that ridiculous. He is saying she has a right to claim for the years she brought up her son on her own and that she won't be getting anything close to the money she was claiming for. Seems reasonable imo.

So it's possible that others could view you as a ballbreaking militant feminist then?

Tbf you can't be supremely confident of that fact since you can't truly know how others perceive you to be.

Sp almost half a 'share' a minute. Excellent stuff.

Pretty sure thats the iceman AKA Richard Kuklinski. That's another book worth reading and also the HBO documentary. Some of the things he did were horrendous (burnt people's genitals off, ripped them off with his bare hands, fed people alive to rats and filmed it etc.)

I thought you of all people would enjoy that.

love it.

The fact you are worrying about it means you are not. Good books on the subject as mentioned above is the psychopath test but also the sociopath next door and confessions of a sociopath. All interesting.

A self confessed feminist ball breaker.

Imo teams being so weak at the start of this season was a unique situation. I haven't known teams at the top collectively having such a number of problems. They will all be stronger next year and I don't believe we can keep losing our best players and then improve every season. I would love to see it but I would consider it unlikely.

I already had you pegged as a ballbreaker. You're confirming my worst feminist fears.

You would know if I hugged you with a hard on.

Well that's utter bilge. Can't ever remember smirking and myself hunting in a pack. As he said we used to regularly clash a few years ago but we have both calmed down a little since then. With regards to UJ, I can't remember a single issue we have been United on other than this Sexism thing.

You do realise Europa isn't some trial run for the big one? If we get Champions league this season it will be one of the greatest achievements the Premier league has seen. We are unlikely to ever get this close again. If we get Europa then we should enjoy it as much as we can, who knows if we will ever get the opportunity in the future.

Probably have to stitch two straight jackets together tbf.