Graffito

I read that in the Guardian. Not sure how it compares with other teams but it I thought it was an incredible statistic and seems to underline our goal keeping problems.

It's uncanny.

Which still makes a team which isn't much good.

On the face of it he seems a good fit for them but the QPR team isn't much good. Unless he's given plenty to spend it could be the Saints scenario all over again. Relegation would be the death knell of his managerial career and then we'll just have the benefit of his insight in MoTD studio to look forward to. I hope he gets it so we can give him a warm welcome to SMS in March.

John Terry.

Doris Day was a sectarian? I never knew that. Oh well, que sera sera.

Qualification through Fair Play maybe.

Absolute balls.

Cork. Puncheon was good. Shaw is a real talent.

It was a really good performance. All positive. Play like that every week and we'll stay up.

The Goldhawk on Goldhawk Rd. Get off at Goldhawk Rd tube, turn left. Pub is about 200yds on opposite side of road. About 10 minutes from there to the ground.

Can't say something was a turning point except in hindsight. A win and a clean sheet would have given the team such a confidence boost going into what I fear will be a difficult match for us at QPR. The more I think about the more I think it's a right b@stard we gifted Swansea a goal.

You won't win anything with kids. It's a good point though. Saints, liverpool, villa. All struggling a little.

Quite right. Nothing to do with Adkins' coaching. It was an error of judgement which, as Adkins implied, is to be expected from a young player shouldering a lot of responsibility.

It looks to me like more of the same as what we saw last season with a bit more quality added. Carroll was a great signing for them (though his antics against Saints weren't impressive). Jarvis was a good signing. Collins is a big no nonsense unit. Allardyce's methods are tried and tested and relatively simple. If they stay up, and I think they will, he'll add a bit more quality as he did at Bolton. Their fixtures have not been so tough as Saints' allowing them to build on confidence. Whereas Saints have tried to introduce all at once new formations and new personnel with a very tough fixture list which has almost knocked the stuffing out of the players. Add in the manager and chairman being on a steep learning curve and it's no surprise we are where we are. I expect West Ham to fall back down the table but to stay up and I hope by the end of the season we can get the hang of it and move up to safety such that we won't be so far apart points wise.

Fair point well made. Sticking with the manager would seem to be in keeping with ethos of a stable sustainable club building for the future unless to do so would undermine those ambitions. Equally it could be argued that the structure of the club should allow for managers to be replaced without impacting on the longer term ambitions. I'm for keeping NA right now.

I'm not an advocate of laying long but in yesterday's match I think we could have done so a bit more to good effect. Swansea didn't look that good at the back. Would have brought on Mayuka for Puncheon at 70 minutes.

I would say the team was playing conservatively rather than negatively. We've conceded a lot of goals recently. But for the errors that gave them the opportunity to score (expertly taken by Dyer) we would have had all three points and the tactics would have been vindicated.

I saw no quality gap between Saints and Swansea yesterday. We lost yesterday due to errors by two individuals. If Saints' passing isn't as crisp as it has been I would put that down to confidence.

Short term effect. QPR sack Hughes, appoint floppy chops and they beat us next week. You can just see it happening.

No Saints are not aggressive enough. Are Barcelona cloggers?

The saddest part is poor old Ted forever waving at the cement works. Whose fault is that?

We must be nice to Nicola or we'll lose him to AC Milan.

Wtf. I need a lie down after reading that!