Jump to content

chrisobee

Members
  • Posts

    7,098
  • Joined

Everything posted by chrisobee

  1. Eh, Aura About You :smt102
  2. Nobody on here I would imagine, I can see a few fans definitely missing the game tonight now !!
  3. Have no bucks left !!
  4. Well done but you'll need to open a soup kitchen with your winnings at this rate!
  5. That's Dunguib, The Package, Captain Cee Bee and Go Native all very well backed losers. Damn those bookies can easily afford the last 2 favourites to win.
  6. Also popular on here, oh dear oh dear !
  7. Is this one running ?
  8. Stupid money TBH.
  9. Well a double and and a single it will have to be. The bookies are laughing after 2 races.
  10. Captain Cee Bee seems to be the one we want to win in the next, been gambled into 9/4. Edit: Well CCB was never in it.
  11. Yes !! Plenty more races to come though.
  12. Well with them it will remain. Very interesting point about the short run in, they mentioned it on the Morning Line. It might have changed the 1st 2, Danguib never seemed to be close enough.
  13. The 1st race tends to support that !!
  14. Of course it depends on the odds but all 3 winning would I figure pay £250-300 ?
  15. I didn't back Oscar Whisky but 4th was the very worst position, never understand why they only pay 1st 3 in some races including this one ? Anyway, a bookies benefit. They'll be millions of pounds up already
  16. Just :smt102 Words fail me !
  17. I wouldn't bet against that !!
  18. After much thought I'm going for ( in the ATR tipping challenge) : 1.30 Oscar Whisky 10 points ew at 10/1 2.05 Captain Cee Bee 20 points to win at 3/1 ( Simply I think will win IF doesn't get let down by his jumping. However, his name is the clincher ! ) 2.40 The Package 15 points to win at SP ( so I'm hoping that will be at least 11/2) 3.20 Go Native 15 points to win at 9/2 4.00 Garde Champetre 10 points to win at SP ( so hoping for 2/1 +) 4.40 Voler La Vedette 20 points to win at SP - (my NAP of the day, hoping for 7/4+ ) Oops, just realised this exactly matches Bungle's tips ( though I know you want Zaynar to win), could be a sign though good or bad I don't know !!
  19. Just have to decide now how best to use my free £2 Daily Mirror bet ( Hills) and £1 sun free bet ( Ladbrokes). Might as well go for something like Chain of Command at 200/1 ( 1.30) though I do like Oscar Whisky more and more in the same race at about 9/1. Hmm, could do both !
  20. It might be too late to apologise !!
  21. St Helens might lose but only in the handicap betting with Toulouse at least 50 points + !
  22. With thanks to Matt Bisogno who knows infinitely more about Horse Racing than I do a briefish guide to Day 1 : http://www.geegeez.co.uk/4096/cheltenham-festival-2010-day-one-preview/ Supreme Novices’ Hurdle Tapes up for Cheltenham 2010: Dunguib It all kicks off with the Supreme Novices’ Hurdle at 1.30. Dunguib should win. He reminds me of the magical mare, Like-A-Butterfly, who won four straight prior to taking on 28 rivals for the opener. Dunguib can hardly expect to win this swinging off the bridle, and there are lots of horses with which there is no form line. But he’s a proper racehorse, whatever noises people are making about sore shins and can’t jump and this and that. Although he can hardly be considered value at around evens, I think he’s likely to win. The style and time of his victory over Fionnegas last time was breathtaking, and he did that apparently without jumping and with pain in his legs. Really? Come off it! The Irish have traditionally had the best of the opening skirmish on the opening day, and I expect it to be the same tomorrow. If I had to back one each way, which I won’t be, I’d side with Philip Hobbs’ Menorah. I know he got beaten in a noddy race the other day, but his overall form level, against proven horses in UK, is as high as pretty much anything else, bar the favourite. And, at 12 or 14/1, he’s far better value for me than Get Me Out Of Here, at half that price. Sure, Get Me Out Of Here won the totesport Trophy, which is a competitive enough heat. But he received weight from most of the field (and all of the leading contenders), bungled the last (and several before), and took a cut to his heel. Moreover, his trainer said that the plan was to win that race, and anything else would be a bonus. So he’ll have been cherry ripe that day. Keeping him at perfect pitch for another five weeks is a huge challenge and, whilst he should have further improvement, he’s not for me. Timeform top two: Dunguib 166p, Get Me Out Of Here and Menorah, both 161p Arkle Trophy Next up it’s the Arkle Trophy, a steeplechase over two miles for novices. Both French Opera and Tataniano will contest the closing event of the week, the Grand Annual, as opposed to the second one, the Arkle. Bugger. It’s especially disappointing because I think this year’s renewal looks wide open, and there are reasons not to side with any of the market protagonists. And Timeform had French Opera rated just a pound below Captain Cee Bee and clear second best (I put him up at 33/1). Captain Cee Bee is bidding to be the first nine year old winner since 1988, and only the third ever. The race was incepted in 1946! Good luck with that. Although Somersby hasn’t raced for three months, and missed his prep due to abandonment, he might be the soundest bet in the race. His hurdles form was top drawer (third to Go Native and Medermit in the Supreme last year), and two bloodless victories over fences, including a definitive decision over the talented Crack Away Jack. The Irish have a poor record in the Arkle, despite one of their newspapers sponsoring the race, and I expect the home team to grab the tuck again this time. I don’t have a bet in the race after my two were pulled out (even more frustrating to learn that Timeform had French Opera rated just one pound inferior to Captain Cee Bee, and my ticket had him at 33/1!). But I might back Somersby on the day. Timeform top two: Captain Cee Bee 169, Somersby 165p William Hill Trophy The first of the handicap races at the Festival, the William Hill Trophy acts as a nice buffer between the Arkle and the feature of the day, the Champion Hurdle. It’s a steeplechase, run over a distance of three miles and a hundred metres (mixing my imperials and my metrics nicely there). So, after the marathon, the winner will need a sprint! My three against the field are The Package, Khachaturian, and Boychuk (if he gets in). This race is normally won by a fancied runner, and I think The Package must go mighty close. Khachaturian and Boychuk both have two ways of running: if either is on a going day, then we’ll have some fun and maybe cash a big ticket. But it’s possible they’ll not fancy it, and I’ll be left with The Package. That’s the chance you take. [Note also that both the bigger priced duo are usually front-runners, so it will be interesting to see if they can get their preferred position.] Also of interest in the race, at the top end of the weights, are the numerous Grand National entries having their final prep. The likes of Character Building (whose National chance I like very much), Comply Or Die and Niche Market will be interesting to observe, with an eye to Aintree. Timeform top rated: The Package 172, a whole host of horses on 171 Champion Hurdle After the hubbub of the handicap chase, comes the speed and style of the Champion Hurdle, the feature event on Day One, at 3.20. There have been a couple of significant ‘will he, won’t he’ scenarios in the run-up to this race, with both Solwhit and Binocular questionable starters. I remember many moons ago Nick Mordin saying that Grade and Group 1 races are hard enough to win when everything has gone spot on, let alone with an interrupted preparation. I mean, despite the staggering common sense virtue of that statement, why do we so often overlook it and try to find a justification for backing a horse whose prep has been stunted. It’s true that we might miss the occasional winner, but we’ll swerve plenty of losers as well. For this reason alone, I’ll be against Solwhit (who, with no Cheltenham experience, couldn’t win anyway – according to the trends at least!) and Binocular (who was beaten fair and square at the last two Festivals and has done nothing to justify reversing form with a bunch of horses since). Celestial Halo does have to overcome the poor run last time. But I reckon he’s Ruby’s best chance of a day one winner. Timeform top two: Solwhit 176+, Zaynar 176 Cross Country Chase Derided by many, it has proven a punters’ pal since its inception, and this year ought to be no exception. Form over this variety of obstacles wins the day, and hat-trick seeking Garde Champetre will be very tough to beat. Biggest danger is likely to be stablemate L’Ami, and don’t rule out Sizing Australia. Nothing British-trained is likely to get near first place (although Philip Hobbs has a surprisingly strong entry, given he’s no pedigree in these races at all). I’ve not had a bet yet, but will be backing Garde Champetre (9/4), with a money-back saver on L’Ami (7/2). Timeform top two: Garde Champetre 169, Monkerhostin, A New Story, both 168 Mares’ Hurdle Tuesday’s finale is the Mares’ Hurdle, a Grade 2 over two and a half miles. It’s a new race, and in its two years, has seen a 20/1 winner and a 2/1 winner. It is not a race that I tend to play in. I’ll be finishing off my pint, and writing up my notes at this stage. Quevega is the favourite, at a general 5/4, and this is PLENTY short enough for a horse who hasn’t raced since tailing off in Paris in May. That said, she won this race easily last year and, on that form, would be tough to beat. The one I like though, is Voler La Vedette, an improving young lady, who has won four on the bounce, including a thirteen length trouncing of an admittedly unfit Go Native. There’s nothing in this race of that calibre, including the short priced jolly, and at 5/2 she really should go close. I’ve looked down the rest of the card trying to find a value alternative, but I can’t. Most of these would be uncompetitive in the handicap hurdles, so it is difficult to make a case for this race really. Voler La Vedette for me. Timeform top two: Quevega 171, Voler La Vedette 166
  23. If memory serves I believe the concensus back in July/August was that all the upheaval was almost certainly going to impact on the early part of the season. However, irrespective of how good my memory is in regard to that point I'd have been absolutely amazed if we had not got off to a slow start. When you look at the millions spent by say Real Madrid it is clear no matter what you do and how much you spend time always is a major issue and only since January do I believe we have seen what I'd describe as AP's team. As I say often it took LM FOUR years to rebuild the team that got relegated in 1974, it was of course made far more bearable by the '76 FA Cup win. As I stated in the "Best signing" thread these were LM's signings 1974-78: David Peach Peter Osgood ( Ok, he and Peach were signed during our relegation season but we were well and truly on the slide by then, the 1st game Peach played in we lost 7-0 at Ipswich !) Mel Blyth Jim McCalliog Peter Rodrigues- So there are 5 of the FA Cup winning side for starters Ted McDougall Alan Ball Chris Nichol Mick Pickering Phil Boyer- 5 more along with Peach instrumental in our 1977/78 promotion success Essentially 2 sets of signings, only Peach really made a major impact in 1977/78, Osgood left in November 1977 I think. So promotion in 2 years which I'm very confident we'll achieve is for this "Saint" wholly acceptable and I just wish Cortese would stop sending out what I see as mixed messages and state he fully backs Pardew rather than coming out with quotes such as: " “We spent quite a considerable amount of money in the transfer window, “Simply, when you do that automatically your expectations change. “When the manager comes to ask me about buying players, we also talk about what we are going to end up with when we are buying those players. “So we were always on the same page with what we want to achieve." Which in the context of the Echo report: http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/5060343.Cortese_denies_Pardew_rift/ Is quite simply no less than the play offs. In terms of the article's headline: " Cortese denies Pardew rift " I'm not convinced he does say that. Fair to say if I had to chose between the 2 I'd buy the ticket back to Switzerland myself ! Quite simply I have no doubt AP is an excellent manager and I see no realistic alternative even if I wanted one, I don't thank you Mr Cortese.
  24. TBH it clearly is common knowledge that non whites are far more likely to be stopped but the question is why and is it justified? Unfortunately I suspect the ever growing need for political correctness prevents Police forces going into detail as to the ratio between stop and search and the resulting prosecutions which arise. In relation to the point made by Nathan there must be stats available ( aren't there stats for everything these days!) and I see no reason why they should not be public knowledge, indeed I believe we have a right to know. However, the absence, as far as I'm aware, of these stats in the public domain might lead someone more cynical than me to believe the stats may reveal that the disproportionate amount of non whites who are stopped and searched is not justifiable. The report quoted by hamster ( http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/media-centre/warning-from-commission-over-disproportionate-use-of-stop-and-search-by-police/ ) seems to me at least to indicate that stop and search is on the whole used incorrectly and as quite rightly stated this is likely to be self defeating. However, I feel you need to try to read between the lines to draw proper conclusions whereas simply publishing the stats showing how many of those who are stopped and searched are found to have committed a crime is a far more accurate and easier guide to the issue.
×
×
  • Create New...