
SaintRichmond
Members-
Posts
3,975 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by SaintRichmond
-
Sorry, but I don't read it like that at all ........ Pinnacle is asking Mawhinney to do something which they WILL NOT DO ........
-
Compromise at all times ....... M'Lord ............
-
One vital bit missing .... " In the case of uncertainty in any aspect, The League reserves the right to implement another ruling in their favour as and when it sees fit " ....... What DOES annoy me though .... A) We went into Admin ONE WEEK LATE .............. WHY ??????????? B) All through this, it was known that we were TOO LATE to challenge the -10 .......... NOW Pinnacle make out that THAT is their reason for pulling out It doesn't wash .
-
OK ... it's illegal .......... so it would be thrown out if challenged in a court of law then ????? SO SIGN IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
SO, as a businessman, Fry must know that ............. so why is he actively talking to people who will NOT pay anything like what Pinnacle would ????
-
SO, why is a Newspaper of the Times calibre NOT up to speed with LATEST quotes ???
-
Just because Pinnacle would not accept the FL constraints does not mean "others" will not It would however be a Very Poor deal for SFC We'd be in existance, but what a cost
-
-
It is pretty certain that WHOEVER Buys us will HAVE to accept :- The FL's -10, plus -15 ... plus anything else the FL chuck at us Jackson WILL accept such constraints .... but I cannot see anyone else accepting them In effect, we would already be in Div 2
-
Yes, I was all for Administration .......... but even I did not think that Barclays?Lowe would be STUPID enough to wait until ONE week after the Leagues cut off date before doing so .... that in itself STINKS, it guarenteed -10 Pinnacle ??? ..... IMHO, have never really come across as being 100% sincere. We knew and they knew of the 10 point penalty, and not many pundits thought that we could get out of it ............ yet Pinnacle have been making great play re this .... WHY ??? ........The Mystery Man is just that, a complete MYSTERY ..... a Load of Irish Blarney Everybody knows who I think will end up back in control ..... I have always thought this, as I think that he started the whole ball rolling. It won't be long before we are put in the real picture
-
Yup ........ enter Jackson ....... another -15 points ......... and another 12 years of Nil Investment.........
-
Peter Reid "I knew nothing until I read the Echo"
SaintRichmond replied to Master Bates's topic in The Saints
Same one that Gary Glitter used .......... -
Peter Reid "I knew nothing until I read the Echo"
SaintRichmond replied to Master Bates's topic in The Saints
Poor Sod .......... at least most of us had SOME sort of education ........ -
Yes, I agree, there would be some (including myself) who would be clamouring for info However, if there is no REAL info to give .... why bother to just say "we are still talking etc " ...... You do not get a verdict in a Trial, until the Jury has come to a verdict ...... ONLY THEN does it get uttered to the rest of the world
-
Nothing of real substance I agree ... jusr the bare bones, but I still think that "running from the room" every now and then, to try and allay our "fears", is NOT a professional Company's way of going through what is a very long and complicated procedure for a Company to aquire ownership Maybe nice to hear, but from a Professional point of view just doesn'r sit right IMHO
-
Throughout all this time, one basic thought keeps coming back at me..... IF Pinnacle ARE so professional, and IF they are so serious in taking us over .... IMHO, they would NOT want a "mouthpiece", ie Tony Lynam, coming on here to give us "day by day" summaries ..... no matter what Business is business, and until it is concluded, Pinnacle, IF serious, would want EVERYTHING kept firmly to their chest
-
Makes sense ... If you read something and don't like it, but still sign, then that's your fault .... you are deemd to be complicit ....... I don't know the Legal position if you sign something "under duress" ..... mind you, the League would not let anyone do that, as it immediately highlights what could be, and most likely is, a "Flaw" in their "System"
-
I am 5ft 9"
-
Shergar ............
-
It could well be that Pinnacle are trying to get the FL to put it in writing that once they Take SFC over, the FL won't then say " Oh by the way, it's ANOTHER 15 points on top " ..........
-
Now that you mention it ........ I am feeling a bit Lowe about the Pinnacle situation ........... thanks for reminding me ........
-
No latest update from " Mr Info " Lynam ?????
-
Because, now that Pinnacle have had it categorically said to them that the FL will NOT allow any appeal re the -10 points ...... ... they are "considering their position" ......... As opposed to Mr Lynam categorically stating yesterday, that, "we are going to buy this Club"
-
And neither will you once he is back ........
-
CORRECT ......... with Lowe as the "Silent Voice" behind it all ......... I hope all the posters who have shouted me down will be Happy when he returns .....What say YOU Stanley ????? I would go so far as to say this .... the Longer Pinnacle drag this out ..... the Stronger the Lowe camp will become ....