Dig Dig

Hopefully he's loving being first choice left back and getting premier league games. Having said that, we should still be in the market for a LB who can compete with Shaw who is more experienced.

Adkins confirmed that he would be offered a new contract to sign on his 18th Birthday, the same as JWP I believe and the club are confident that he will sign.

Agree with this, but who exactly on here has called a disabled person a mong or a spaz?

Far worse than Hypo's comment imo and unprovoked as well.

Seems like you'd have to start a new thread to get a response. Eggs gone into slippery politician answer mode.

It was only about 4 pages in, took no time at all

You're still small fry mate. You haven't even paid your fiver FFS

Thank you stain, at least you get it

I think the thread has morphed into a discussion on those who like to patronise and take the morale high ground when they are probably less than impeccable themselves, wouldn't you agree?

As someone who grew up in Millbrook, I find the whole concept of a thread mocking poorer areas as extremely offensive. Added to the fact that in one fell swoop he's managed to potentially offend obese people, women and those with learning difficulties. I am outraged.

I was offended for you mate

I see Egg was being derogatory towards Scottish people in a thread about Adkins last month: I'm pretty sure he's on his way, and could see Strachan coming in. Blackpool would be a good move for NA. The timing of Scotland sacking is interesting. I reckon the sweaties want Strachan and are aware that others want him too. Egg, please refrain from using derogatory comments like this. You need to think about the audience of a public forum which could include Scottish Southampton fans or general football fans who may find this offensive.

Lee has never looked comfortable when put out wide. Understandable as he is a striker who makes runs between the lines. We play 4231 yet seem to have an ambundance of central strikers and only a couple of players who can play wide of the attacking midfield three. The club have to improve our options here instead of trying to make otherwise talented strikers play in a position and system which they are not used to.

Offensive. Mods, please infract and ban this poster.

On reflection I am offended by the word Gay. It implies that homosexual people are happier than hetrosexual people and IMO also implies that hetrosexual people are not capable of being happy. I am outraged and will be writing to my MP to suggest that this word isn't used to describe any persons sexual orientation.

Isn't it a compliment? Obviously Enrique looks better with whiter teeth so his mate was just asking if he was gay on the basis that he's better groomed. I know not every gay person is well groomed and it's a stereotype but not necessarily a negative one I would say.

I hear you Tokes, but it's quite nice in a way when the penny drops for those who had previously been looking down their noses at you. You will have just taken away the only thing in life which makes them feel a little better about themselves. Egg is acting like a bit of an egg. I don't really understand the "I don't care what you call people and am not offended but asking that you don't use certain words just in case someone else is" argument to be honest. People love taking the morale high ground but very rarely take a look at themselves. As I said on that thread previously, if we all audited each other we would all find things which are said or done which could be offensive to someone. I think you can do better than Egg though, his "sorry I'm too busy to argue with you on a moong bean board" approach just will not do.

He's showing you up with his adult to child like posting style tokyos. I bet part of you just want's him to tell you you are a good boy really.

I am outraged by this on behalf of any female contributer who may read this post. I politely ask that everyone refrains from comments like this so we can ensure that the SFW is the most inclusive and PC forum on the net.

Most ignorant post on the thread IMO

Well said

All valid points but there are many sources of comfort which involve spirituality but doesn't result in non-believers being told they are basked in sin and would burn in hell for all of eternity if they don't believe and comply.

Maybe the computer sim is the best theory!

In that case 5 for calling DPS a t wat is outrageous. If anything you should have been given 5 of the opposite of infractions, whatever that would be!

How many infractions do you need before you are banned?