Jump to content

stknowle

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    4,292
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by stknowle

  1. That's how I saw it as I yawned my way round Harry Potter World with the Mrs whinging at me for watching a match stream on the phone. We just don't cope too well with direct teams with big hefty forwards do we.
  2. Danso at right back didn’t work out too fantastically last time we tried it. Think we should give that a swerve.
  3. We've been here before but mute often gets a run out when the required word is moot.
  4. Really enjoyed that today should have won by far more was worried about conceding equaliser seemed inevitable after missing so many easy chances what’s that pal no I have not heard of punctuation come on you Saints
  5. Yes
  6. Totally mate/pal, that's why I said "highly entertaining". Gutted as well though, tbf, so used to this type of thing year after year after year against big sides I'm sort of over it already. Life's too short and all that.
  7. What happened with the third goal?
  8. Agreed, this (highly entertaining) balls out full press system does kind of rely on scoring the numerous chances it creates. Inevitable that a/it will leave gaps at the back and b/we will tire towards the end and leave even more gaps.
  9. Enough quality to dominate the game. Missing chances though and also looking too vulnerable to the counter against an under-performing team.
  10. Infuriating and so, so predictable. Move on.
  11. Yet again the better side away from home. Very comfortably. BUT we do look too open to the counter and obviously the JWP thing is a massive problem. It's not so much the RB position assuming Valery and KWP are up and running quickly but it basically leaves us with Romeu and Hojberg as our midfield probably for the rest of the season until one/other or both gets suspended/injured. Our squad is stupidly wafer thin and it's going to hurt us.
  12. Well the maximum we could get is 15. 5 matches, 3 points per match. 5 x 3 = 15. Luv always,MLG.
  13. Even the highlights are biased ffs. Where's the coverage of our first half chances!? FFS fuming.
  14. Understood, thanks.
  15. Why if it reviewed it didn't it get overturned init?
  16. Well **** me there's a surprise.
  17. Brief skim through the following posts confirms this is probably your most successful attempt ever.
  18. The one I remember must’ve been the excitable one. I upset him once and he sent me a semi-aggressive pm.
  19. He was crap yesterday. Properly crap. But he was a CB playing at RB. If you look at his numerous **** ups they were basically due to him drifting into his natural position of CB and leaving (massive) gaps at RB. You could argue that as a professional footballer he should have the nouse not to do that, but you might also argue that if he was playing in his accustomed position he wouldn't be responsible for such an inept sh!tshow.
  20. I really miss Pastor Patron's contributions. Also Roger, anyone know what happened to him?
  21. Agreed, and I can't remember it either. Might not even be true.
  22. stknowle

    Che Adams

    Came on again today. Didn't really have long but......did 2 tenths of duck all in the limited time he had. Just sayin.......
  23. Hmmmm having reviewed the highlights Danso was wincingly culpable for every chance Spurs had. They dried up after he went off.
×
×
  • Create New...