Dark Munster

Can someone explain what is the criteria for a points deduction for a "poor wicket"? I can see if no teams gets above 150, but for the Sussex match they almost made it to 300 in their first innings, and had a player make a century.

Are you Bazunu's Dad?

Good news: No Salah. Bad news: Isak and Chiesa will tear us a new one.

All of us, except Ankersen and his SR bunch of clueless morons.

Unless we’re in the bottom three they will probably give him the whole season, or more, based on their track record and gross incompetence.

That's what they may say, but at the end of the day he was a rabid supporter of that piece of shit, the Mango Mussolini, openly racist, convicted sexual abuser, and closest friend of one of the world's worst paedophiles.

Hair grooming?

He ought to be, if we had owners who had a clue what they are doing. But we don't, a bunch of clueless muppets, who only sacked their previous disastrous managers after we hit rock bottom, and they had no choice. So I can't see them sacking Still unless we lose 10 in a row or something similarly disastrous. If we finish mid to lower table (which would be a disgrace given our resources compared to most of the other dross in this league) I can see them "giving him more time". I came on here to have another laugh at RM, but it's wearing thin given that it looks like SR have replaced him with someone who is equally clueless. Hopefully not, but the signs so far aren't encouraging.

I’d bite your arm off for a dull 2nd.

I can name dozens of Republicans in Congress who are crazy loons (not to mention their Dear Leader). Democrats aren't angels (who is?) but can you name one who you think is a crazy loon?

Full of americans Republicans.

Final score. Incredibly this is only their fourth W.C. qualifying loss ever.

"My ex-girlfriend who dumped me is ugly. I never fancied her anyway."