Jump to content

John B

Members
  • Posts

    9,956
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by John B

  1. What the hell sacking Pardew has got to do with Liverpool I have no idea. It is very negative to give somebody a job to do in five years and not to give him a contract for that length of time that is my point. If he cant do the job why appoint him?
  2. I would agree but as we have a five year plan Pardew should be given every chance of carrying it out thats all
  3. Why take notice of other posters it takes time to get a team working well. As you know Peter Osgood came to us in 1974 and during our lean spell failed to score a goal and we got relegated still a fine player
  4. That is how I feel too
  5. It does not mean that getting in loads of players will make the team win. The squad is good on paper and now the Manager and Coaches need to make it good on the pitch
  6. So you agree that NC/ML could have been more positive and given AP a 5 year contract. If Pardew was the right man for the job he should be given the five years to get to the Premiership.
  7. I think we have enough players to cover for injuries we have probly 25 or so players capable of playing effectively in League 1
  8. I know which means that NC/ML are not confident of Pardew leading us to the Premiership.
  9. I was wondering this morning how much would need to be invested to produce a team capable of staying in the Premiership
  10. Perhaps you could suggest a reason then ?
  11. That is why I find it difficult to believe that we were getting to the play offs this season. Eventually we will get promoted
  12. Yes there is Ignore I think
  13. So why not a five year contract?
  14. I have always thought that doing really well in the JPT was a reasonable goal which would show that we were competitive in League 1. It was always unlikely that with the poor start and the loss of 10 points we would be promoted so the JPT was a vehicle for success this season. Getting to Wembley surely would be welcome after our failures in recent years
  15. That is not negative I would have thought pretty positive and realistic. Suggesting that things need to get better is clearly better than accepting performances which are not good. Things are obviously getting better at SFC but things are not good on the pitch at the moment to suggest that we will be promoted this season or get automatic promotion next. Hopefully with the new players things will improve and promotion will be achieved soon - I still think having a five year plan puts increased pressure on everybody.
  16. Surely being a first is a positive .
  17. Be a first I would have thought
  18. I have not checked but people on here think they are
  19. Yes I think so I am looking forward to the JPT next Tuesday and a win and a trip to Wembley will be very good
  20. John B

    Papa Waigo

    Unlike Posters on here;)
  21. I agree but want some good performances against the top clubs so that I am confident of automatic promotion which I am not at present but was about eight weeks ago. We have the players but we need the performances and wins
  22. Because the Leeds one is
  23. Yes you can I think Man U have won it even more times Semi final
  24. Semi final Community shield
  25. I dont think there are many negative posters some are just not as positive as you. I just wish we would play better and have some really good wins in the next few weeks afterall we have spent possibly more than the whole of League 1 all together.
×
×
  • Create New...