Mole

this game is boring as ****

corner norwich, forced to go back to halfway, pumped back, nodded back to KD, KD clears.

Ooooooooh, the home fans are not happy.

hits the wall

free kick in a dangerous position...

It's been easy for us so far.

b0ll0cks.

you can log into my saintstv account if you can guess the username and password.

Are we playing in yellow?

Norwich 2 - 0 Saints But the boysh played well.

It's strange how Ruperts rat pack don't want to answer the question...

Yeah Lowe is skiing in the Alps and i doubt meek Mike will turn up either.

My personal view is that it's a failure already, but relegation will probably be when most on here judge his masterplan a failure.

Am i getting a bit confused here, but i thought it was Wilde and his Execs that spent all the money post relegation.:confused:

I said in the early days they were wasting money on pointlessly poxy numbers of shares. 1885 shares gimmicks and such like was an idiotic way for a new club to throw away subs that should have been put into the bank and used to grow the Trust. They should have got someone on the Trusts board with accountancy skills as i'm sure he would have advised they concentrated on building up a membership base before trying to become players in the PLC.

Well if Lowe and Wilde bought us out post admin i think i'd spontaneously combust, but i just don't see it happening. Look at them both now - Lowe is on holiday and Wilde makes Jimmy Saville look sociable. I don't undersestimate Lowe as he'd probably love to do it just to **** everyone off and get pleasure out of this, but even he must now know that he's Saints equivilent of Gerald Ratner and to get his friends to bankroll him would be a major gamble.

This 30% (is it called something like a concert party?) has been a headache for us. If we were to go into administration would it be easier for Saints to become owned by a single person and the PLC ditched?

But would it be better for fans? The FOTB would be constrained by a confidentiality clause effectively meaning he (or she) would by voting how he (or she) saw fit. Of course if whatever was being voted on had already been voted on by Trust members that's ok, but the there would be occasions where the FOTB had to vote of his (or her) own back. Would you trust Nick Illingsworth to vote on your behalf without knowing how he was going to vote?

The more the better. That said Lowe won't care as he won't see it. We need to sing anti lowe songs during the game.

The Trust failed because it tried to run before it could walk. It squandered money on a negligable number of shares that would have been better spent on administration. It threw away it's independence by accepting proxies from Wilde and Crouch. It got led up the garden the path by Wilde in respect of having a fan on the board. The very idea of a fan on the board is ridiculous because the said FOTB would be a law unto himself for the simple reason he'd be voting as he saw fit, not as the membership saw fit, if there had not been a Trust ballot previously which set in stone the views of members. Nick Illingsworth is the current chairman and i for one would not want him voting in meetings propped up by the weight of my Trust membership!

It'll never be feasible at Saints nor for the majority of English league clubs. Perhaps if we were a noddy outfit like a Bournemouth it could work but Saints are just to big and would require huge participation. Look to the Saints Trust and you can see it couldn't work.

We can only speculate on what finances Lowe and Wilde have available, but my suspician is that Wilde probably isn't in a position to invest but Lowe probably is.

Yet more juvenile drivel. Not that we would expect any different from you.

Welldone for turning another thread into drivel you stupid adolescent.

Could the drivel posts from the muppet show gang be deleted from this thread please.