Window Cleaner

WE WON'T GET A FEE. This "transfer" is completely under the radar and therefore must be to some non-entity club or other. If we end up getting shot of him without actually paying somebody to take him off our hands we'll be lucky. I think he's an OK player,when he wants to be, but you just can't deal with his sort of blowing hot and cold and always wanting to be off somewhere else. Marseille found out the hard way,the one the causes intense pain about wallet high, so have we.

I think he was being sarcastic.

I bet we don't see a bent farthing out of Swansea this side of August.

But he wants to leave Robbie, that's the f*cking point.

We won't actually get any money for him, doubt if they have more than a couple of bent drachmas down at CSBJKX Famagusta or whatever it is.

What that mighty midget, won't get any change out of Perry and Saeijs.

In fact without Dyer and that other bloke who hurt his shoulder they'll be pretty depleted. I think we'll give them a right old going over..on the other hand maybe not.

Told you so !!

Let them bring the cheque for 800K on Saturday then. That will be a result even before the game starts.

Probably the same morons who flooded Vulcan's switchboard night and day.

I somehow get the impression that Saga needs to get his ass kicked on a fairly regular basis otherwise he drops into a sort of semi-robotic humdrum. Just an impression mind you.

Unless of course Ruperthas been noting down the seat numbers of all the "boycotters" and sold them those as well.

He also said we were getting investment in 3 to 6 months every 3 to 6 months. He also said "it is Paul Allen" In fact he said a whole lot of stuff, in the end the execs told him it would be just as well if he didn't say anything at all about anything whatsoever. Pity he didn't keep it zipped instead of uttering this sort of bilge "There is no rush because we are very happy with what Jason and John are doing," said the Southampton chairman Leon Crouch. "In the meantime we will continue our hunt for new investment." What they were doing being beating Leicester in the cup, losing at home to Norwich and getting a shaky draw at Palace, yep reasons to be cheerful 1.2.3

What for ??

Are we down to just the one now then??

Better still, drift off to the match before it starts.

Depends what his "transfer budget" was though doesn't it. We only sold 10000 or so STs so there was no money for big transfers a priori. He might not have bought Schneiderlin for the 600K euros we've paid to date,he probably wouldn't have sold Davies either so that goes down as a minus in the ledger.Might have kept Rasiak and John so we'd be 30x20K down on the salary mass as well. Pearson probably earns more than ll the rest lumped together and we'd have had to either get an assistant or keep Dodd on, another one for the minus column.Did Crouch plan on keeping all those who left in June, wowee thats a big one in the red letter column.Yet we have no money, oh yeah another 5000 on every home gate ,5000x20x14(except there's a lot of kids and students)= about a million 4, so just what we gained on Davies really (less his pay for a non-player). Yep we'd have been f*cking fantastic, and in administration.

Never heard of a "claque". There will be a few people there for sure, perhaps not all with the same reason.

Then they will be able to hold their meeting in a telephone box, same as the AGM of the Southampton Virgins Society.

Aha, but if you read the half year accounts for the 6 months to December 2007 (execs rule OK) we were 5.8 million overdrawn but there was 6.4 million receivable in outstanding transfer fees (receivable by August 2008). So despite probably receiving at least half of that and 10000x£400 (av) ST receipts we smoked up our OD big time. Because we paid a lot of money for absolute waste of time shïte (and Richard Wright) Ian Pearce was an absolute f*ck off joke. Played 1 game, probably took us for over 100K. I suppose we received the Swans from the Scottish FA as well,what the f*ck did we do with all the money to have an overdraft of 6.62 million at the end of June 2008?. Gave it to Gorman and Dodd and Pearson no doubt.

Perhaps Mike Wilde didn't fancy rubber stamping one of Rupert's former "choices". I mean Wotte's CV is by far superior to Jan's, he might even be considered as a "good signing". The rest is an enigma, unless Rupert (and Mike) knew that it might go tits up and wanted an extra "fuse". They perhaps might not be as ignorant about football as we think and knew that the kids first system was a sure fire f*ck up,relying totally on a good run of results at the end of the season to save our sorry asses (dangerous strategy,worked last season though). They've slashed costs and now we're going into overdrive with the first fuse gone.

Perhaps Wotte just told Jan that he thought he was a crap coach. Ever tried working with a 100% idiot who's incompetent yet has the authority to do whatever he wants? It really gets on your tits,and as he's on another department you can't ball him out without blowing the whistle on him to senior management because of the command chain.

Don't think I've had a dividend since nineteen canteen, or rather 2004.

I have a question. When Crouch was in charge why didn't he loan us 2 million quid and keep our overdraft within it's approved limits.? I mean he ran us up to 6.62 million against a 4.5 million agreement didn't he?? Or does "having the support of the bank" mean that it was OK to overun our overdraft limit?

I bet Skacel is off somewhere desperately trying to persuade someone to give him a 5 months loan contract.