Thedelldays

with our result and now this one...the world will now end

i thought i wa supposed to be a depressive... what a load of ald tosh

Arsenal were the better team. As expected. But to suggest we went out there too negative when we kept one of the best teams in the country at 1-0 and had our chances was good going. Beattie had that offside goal, ormerods chance and ashley coles clearance off the line in the last min

Does it matter if the spelling is not perfect does that detract from the point being made? No it does not The o poster might be posting using their phone which puts correct punctuation at the bottom of the priority list.

And it neEly paid off. We were litterly inches from pushing arsenal to extra time

he is delighted.... not a great deal else for him to say I dont think

im sure we could cherry pick examples ffs under WGS we went to highbury and got completely tonked 6-1 or what ever it was... cherry picking is easy

two reasons after looking into it could be.. 1. nuclear siren that is tested twice a year...once in pompey once in southampton 2. live ammo (large ammounts) being traversed around marchwood military port

1-1 though with the best 11 we could put out better than i would dream of...

so with our best 11 or so and their decent 11...it was 1-1 we change it around etc and we lose 3-0 happy with that

so...a nuclear sub could not come alongside usinf RFA dilligence which is in the pipeline to do in southampton/liverpool andor another dock then...? also..you would have no idea if one was due to use the berth or not.. the fact that they do from timeto time means certain procedures have to be practiced...... if the siren is for this

well yes...being in league 1 does that when face a giant of european football after they had just put 4 (without reply) past a team (and a decent one) a league higher in the week... this would be the case with lowe/mcmenemy/leibherr/lord lucan in charge f the club

do they not visit around once a year at least..?

derry this is way OTT i was expected to ship more than 4...so I guess in my mind, the coaching staff did something right

yes

rather patronising.. i have understood this league years ago

might be about a nuclear spillage or a reactor accident.. the siren would be to warn the the docks or the local services

this is clearly bollix

There are no stars in the pictures because the exposure times of the cameras were far too short. The stars are simply too faint to show up. This is something that can easily tested back on Earth; set a manual camera for a daylight exposure and take a picture of the night sky. The Moon would show up, but stars wouldn't. The astronauts didn't report seeing stars from the surface because their eyes were adjusted to the bright surface of the Moon. In bright light, the iris of the eye contracts to limit the amount of light that goes into the eye. This severely limits the ability of the eye to simultaneously see bright objects - like the lunar surface - and faint objects, like stars. So they couldn't see stars while on the Moon's surface, and for good reason. If you don't believe this, wait for a clear night. Go stand under a bright streetlight, and look up. Your eyes will adjust to the brightness of the light and, in doing so, prevent you from seeing stars. The astronauts reported seeing stars when they were away from bright light, especially when on the night side of the Moon.

yes disgusting winning the champions league, premiership, having the world player of the year, spending 30 million on strikers, an god knows how much of foreign teenagers.. what ****s

nuclear accident on site perhaps... open your mind

behave man utd run at a profit and one of the clubs that do...

it was a friendly.... who was it against last year...west ham.hardly prestige.. it is a match used to remember Ted Bates..but at the end of the day, it is a friendly and i fully expected more than 4 past us given the score they got in bristol, the state of our squad and everything else..

nah that was a burley excuse....remember the word.. "GEL"