dune

3.15 we have two canoes in the rapids final.

Gold coming up in the shooting, Wilson is uncatchable.

ha, thought we'd lost in the boxing but it turned out the black was our boxer so I was cheering the wrong one on.

Nothing new there then.

yesssssssssssssss, f/cking amazing, she's in the final. Beat the world champion FFS. you've gotta see this on the news, she was knackered but got a rush of strength and threw her opponent down. fantastic.

c'mon gemma, do the frog.

Our old OS was better than it is now.

*puts Snotty on ignore*

Of course not. It's as unlikely as someone pmíng someone who's ITK and requesting that they stop divulging stuff to the peasants and just divulge it to them.

Are you just going to leave us hanging or tell us who you have put on ignore? It's a bit like being ITK and announcing that you know something but you're not going to say what it is.

Well surely having to pay 1.50 on top of an advertised price is the price anyway. They could just the same advertise tickets for a quid and then add on a 30 quid booking fee.

Of course prices will need to keep rising, but the point i'm making is that by increasing transparency it will make it easier for consumers to shop around between airlines and this will force budget airlines to reduce their margins. Pretty much in the same way supermarkets are always competing for our custom.

I'd call it a bonus. I'll be f/cked if i'd pay that, so cheers SKY i'll watch it on TV instead.

If (and hopefully when) they outlaw sneaky add-ons it will not see prices increase IMO, on the contrary it will drive more competitiveness. For example I found i could fly with British Airways on my chosen route cheaper than with easyjet AND with BA they allowed 3kg extra hold baggage weight, they throw in a meal and refreshments & allow a pice of hand luggage and a handbag/laptop. Once these gutter businesses are made to operate transparently they will have to reduce their margins NOT increase prices.

It is something that the government need to stamp out. It's disgraceful.

Hardly following you around when it was you that referred me me to this thread. I cannot fathom why you did though because it's just your usual snide remarks about a poster that brings far more to this place you.

I can't complain much so far. We've done what we've never done and signed players early in the summer. NA said when interviewed by C5 that we would make 1 or 2 more signings. Hopefully one of those will be a big name to put us on the map and keep our current players on their toes.

MLG bites so a few posters wind him up. Personally I don't (maybe have half heartedly once or twice at most) because he does post some interesting stuff and I feel sorry for him when and he gets tedius dullards like you jumping on the bandwagon.

Are you refering to this?

No, it was just you moaning that a thread wasn't high brow enough.

Bore off hypo.

Stop being such a prat. Your pathetic Gordon Brittas routine got a lighthearted thread moved. In future if you don't like one of my thread f/ck off and don't post on it.

All you've done is mither and point out the obvious. So what if it's a dodgy rumour, it's just lighthearted fun.

for someone who isn't interested in the thread this is now your 6th post on it.

WHU have made an audacious bid for Carrol, so if we mean business then i'd expect a big signing this summer to match the talk. The only way we are going to attract better players to deliver what cortese talks about is if we spend a bit of money. this rumour is probably b/llocks, but it is for a player in the ballpark of where we might be aiming.