alpine_saint

Sanity prevails at SMS (for once). But what a climb-down for Lowe !!!! As for Stern, great that last year's top-scorer is rotting on the bench at Bristol City, but what the f**k we dont pay his wages any more - not getting goals is a small price to pay...:rolleyes:

In a f**king nutshell....

At last. Another person sees FC for what he is.

What's benefit of hindsight got to do with it ? Some of us have been saying it since June. Yes it is his choice to be behind Crouch, but unlike you he's got the f**king balls to nail his colours to a mast.

And you claim you have no agenda against Crouch. What a hypocrite..

Oh, and Forecast, Robertson, Pekhart, Smith.... Jesus, do I need to go on ???

So, he got injured. Look at two of Lowes signings - Pulis and Gasmi.... LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Tell me jonah, where exactly were you between the summer of 2006 and January 2009 ? You were never on here, that's for sure. How come you only show up when Lowe is in danger of being out-on-his-arse ?

Agree with all your points, especially the bold one

There you go with you false accusations again... I was non-plussed by his appointment, so f**king what ?

And that's all it is......

Dont be ridiculous. Any you lecture me about "balance"........

heheheh

Because its an incessant stream in one direction with you. You think you are being clever by not coming out with unequivocal fullsome praise of Lowe, probably because you are afraid of sounding like Scooby or Sundance Beast, but at least they had the balls for it.

I personally though of him as the best thing since sliced bread after last season when he rescused a team of fat, unfit, lazy demotivated money-grubbing waankers from relegation with no money and only 13 games left, actually..

You've never seen me mention any of those names in that light, Rupert.

Have a word with yourself. We hear this bolllocks about the team morale all the time, though I am not suprised to be hearing it from you now that the OS is the laughing stock it deserves to be. Oh, and your footstamping and describing people who find your PR ridiculous as "5th columnists" is really unbecoming...

Bit academic though, isnt it ? We know that he went for the cheap "malleable" option, meanwhile Pearson is just about the hottest young prospect in the country. One could try to argue about hindsight making it easy to wise after the event, but then we all know Lowe has made truly shiite tight-fisted ego-driven decisions like this before...

Are we sure the Echo hasnt just lifted the story from here ?

What complete twaddle. This new resolute Southampton will last as long as it takes for them to conceed the first goal.

This thread makes fascinating reading. Point after point is being made to totally amd unquivocally destroy any argument that Lowe's decision to release Pearson made any sense whatsoever, and the ususal suspects are making ever increasing paper-thin defences for him.........

There was supposed to be another serious party interested when the reverse takeover happened, but allegedly Askham and his cronies didnt stand to make as much money.

My understanding too. This was picked up a lot by posters during the offer period...

Isnt part of being "astute" meaning you know when you are hopelessly out of your depth ???