Jump to content

alpine_saint

Members
  • Posts

    23,595
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by alpine_saint

  1. Whats with the pomposity ? I only asked a f**king question....
  2. Has his knee settled down then ?
  3. A truly black day in the clubs recent history. What a long way we have fallen in the last three years...
  4. Great news. Fingers crossed.
  5. lol !
  6. I hope its a good match, you all have a good time, the weather stays fine, and that we get the result we ALL yearn for.... COYR
  7. Superb. He's gone, and we have no money to show for it....:mad:
  8. I'll tell you what is gambling with our future : - Trying a management system that has already FAILED at least twice before at your own hands. - Relying on a bunch of teenagers to make the grade whilst giving away any established experienced players you have, with little attempt to integrate their talents - Employing a management team with little feel for the English CCC game To me, THOSE are real risks.
  9. For me, those reasons are all tenuous. They are too marginal to be real justifications. OK, point 2 is a fact, but I estimate that BWP had probably many more appearances. I cannot forget how many times BWP choked in one-on-ones...
  10. lol.
  11. I never said it was right, but its a fact of life. Lowe started the viewing of fans as "customers". He shouldnt be surprised if they start acting like them (at £26 a throw, £500 for an ST), and vote with their feet.
  12. As I said steve, Saga's move annoyed me more, Rasiak coming on top of that so quickly is just the thin end of the wedge.
  13. Laughable you seem to think that if Lowe puts his hand up and says meekly "Please sir, Mr. Barclays, my manager thinks this player may enable us to have a more successful season, bringing in more gate revenue and in the really best case help us to compete for promotion, we'd like to keep him", that Mr. Barclays is going to say "FOOK OFF, the administrators will be round on Monday morning". The black-white way you are portraying this is hillarious and suggests a limited scope for rational thought.. The truth is, Lowe has probably paid sod-all attention to his managers wishes, and sought a compromise, and most likely just looked at the list of wage earners.
  14. Aye. Amazing so many have forgotten that. Especially as the person in question always blames others and demonstrates very little humility or guilt about past events.
  15. OK, so your strategy is f**k the quality, feel the width. I suppose you think it right that succession of England managers wasted MLT ???
  16. So Rasiak goes to Watford. Next week some team tables an offer for Stern. Tell me, what do you think Lowe would do ?
  17. No. And they will not because they'd have to hand money back as well. What dont you understand ?
  18. Did you not read what I just wrote ? I said two fit strikers. You are assuming John and McGoldrick will stay fit (or not be suspended, etc.) all season. Ridiculous.
  19. LOL. This is superb. You are on top form today, I have to say. Lowe gets rid, and you say you were never a fan. Brilliant !
  20. So our entire cost-cutting strategy is based around Saganowski's wages ? Again, lmfao...............
  21. Well, so far I am not a fan of 32% football, so you'll hopefully forgive me for thinking we need two fit strikers. And if we really want to get rid of wage drains, BWP is the PERFECT candidate...
  22. Correct. It's never going to happen.
  23. I love this argument about strikers: "He only scores goals..." WTF ?????????/
  24. So, if we keep Saganowski the bank will suddenly say SFC is not cutting costs ? So, you ARE saying he costs us £300K a week..... We could have two Frank Lampards for that..........
  25. As I said the other day, if Saga's goals were to bring in a few results, I can easily imagine attendances increasing by 1000. Ergo, he's paid for.......... But no, you carry on lapping up the short-term blinkered spin being fed to you..
×
×
  • Create New...