Olallana

Is that the same useless numpty that last year finished on more goals than the worldclass Billy Sharp?

I´m not sure though but as you say, apparently. International U21 has 3 as the limit (in the Olympics for example)

I always thought 3 is the limit?

In their official statement they hope to have a new manager in place as soon as possible.... People still thinking that is a better strategy than having the replacement ready?

Is it too easy to get it right as an over/under-bet?

I´ll rate it 6/10, with little or bad end product. Like I said in my first post on that MYTH-thread....

Good performances keep happening. Performances, not results.

Oh, I´m gonna save this one, for sure!

I know I will be accused of cherrypicking now, but actually we have never under this season been further away than 4 points from 18th spot, and that is where we are now. And add to that a much better GD that´s almost another point in hand.

Agree on this one + goalkeeping errors hasn´t helped us.

For me it´s pretty obvious I was talking about dominating games in a different way than earlier. (Which for me is about playing like the OP said) And yes, for me performance and results are two different words with different meaning. But still, I dont in any way say that "shots at goal are all that matter", do I? I am even saying that we are not there yet due to lack of quality, for me pretty evident that in that sentence "there" is the same as getting results.

Please tell me where in that quote I am saying "shots at goal is all that matter". Cause I for one can´t see that. And I´ve said it before. The OP on that thread was "We are playing better under MP - MYTH". For me that sounds like OP wants to talk about performances rather than results. But as I said the other day, we can discuss results but wont be much discussion since results are fact. It´s like discussing "Is Oslo the capital of Norway" or "Would you rather sh*g Jessica Alba than Margaret Thatcher".

Hey sweetie, missed me? But for the fun of it. If you can find any quote from me saying that, I´ll give away £100 to any charity you like. Take your time.

yes, business has been awful the last few years.... http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?43668-Saints-financial-figures

Very true. People complaining that we dont score with our possession, but no possession with bad end product wont give us more goals than much possession with no end product. Possession does count, that´s for sure. It´s all about getting more chlinical in the box, other than that we´re a good side at the moment.

Or???

My opinion.....home to Norwich were almost as bad as Sunderland at home. Says it all I guess.... Having different opinions is perfectly fine for me, but you are just mocking stats that are perfectly valid as they have been put out. I said that we are playing much better, and that the way we are playing now will give us a better chance to have sustainable success. I still think so but as I also said, we aren´t there yet due to lack of quality in the final 3rd.

No under that manager we played a goalie that threw balls into the net. Under the manager now we actually are having a goalie...

I know you dont understand it and dont read what people are writing. But are you actually talking about performances there in your last sentence????!!! Surely not....or? So lets put the question out there.....which performance do you think were the best one... Home to Norwich or away to Norwich?

I am just answering the OP, you should try that for once.... But for the record. 4 games yesterday, the teams with most shots in each individual game had 3 wins and 1 draw. Sounds like a good return on that kind of stats to me.

And what total points would Sunderland end up on then? Take your time.

Keep that form last 9 games and we will be safe. Fact!

No MOTM polls lately? Today I actually think I would go for Jos. Thought he came back very good from being dropped last week. That´s what you want to see from players do after being dropped.

Agree entirely. It might be a reason why passes are misplaced but never an acceptable excuse I think.

Then I apologise, my english probably decieves me. Thought you were slating the team that we didn´t in your comment to Charlie.