badgerx16

If the guy was genuinely mentally ill after being involved in the Gulf War, then surely the system let him down big time ?

Isn't there a rule about teams playing in european competitions having to come from the country they represent, and this prevents Cardiff or Swansea playing in europe if they qualify through the PL or the FA Cup ? In which case, that would screw Celtic or Rangers european ambitions.

I wonder if she got paid ? If so, that would be the ultimate insult to his memory.

A few genuine examples from my place of work; In a training course, "now move your mouse around the screen", at which point one attendee does indeed pick up the mouse and rolls it over the surface of the screen. The IT Manager ( !!! ) called me to say his screen was broken. After trying a couple of things over the phone to no avail, I decided to go for the blindingly obvious, "Is it turned on ?". And my favourite one was from a public library.. "I can't get onto (such and such a ) website" "That's because it's down at the moment" "When will you have it fixed" "I'm sorry I can't do anything about it" "Why not ? You're IT aren't you ?" "Yes, but that site is in San Francisco"

"might invite an Irish franchise"..... Since when were football clubs franchises ? I know MK Dons uprooted themselves, but would fans put up with the sort of system the NFL has, with clubs moving around the country chasing financial inducements ? ( Hang on, now I understand why Bagpuss is supportive ... )

The 'Home Secretary' said this was because the experience in the USofA was that the penalty itself wasn't inhumane, it was the protracted existence on Death Row that gave concern. There was also the point about only one appeal being permitted. On the whole I am sure the program hit all the right pro-buttons with the Daily Mail or Currant Bun readers.

But wasn't that part of the pretext of the program ? Britain had to withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights to bring back the death penalty. I would have rather thought that this went against 'natural justice'.

Following on from the capital punishment debate we had in the Lounge a few weeks ago, this served to confirm for me why the death penalty should never be brought back. Within the context of the 'case' portrayed 2 questions come to mind; Firstly, if he had already been found guilty and served time in Vietnam for the 'crimes', whether we approved of the scale of the sentence or not, how would we be able to prosecute him for them again ? Second, if you carry out some act elsewhere in the world, and years later the British Government create a new law against it, could you realistically be charged with breaking a law that didn't exist at the time of your actions ? Particularly if the penalty were so severe.

Up until the 11th century, the 'Scots' mostly lived in Ireland, the 'Caledonians' in what we now call Scotland were mostly Picts. Isn't history confusing at times. Mind you, I think with Glasgow football fans it's generally 'any excuse for a ruck'.

The scots did plenty of invading, raping, and pillaging of English towns as well. Take a lok at the history of Berwick or Carlisle. ( There were also my ancestors, the Border Reivers, who pillaged both sides ). If you look at the Jacobite risings in support of James II, a lot of the forces deployed on the crown side were Scottish covenanters and lowlanders. If you are referring to Culloden and the aftermath, a large part of those 'english' forces were also protestant scots looking for an excuse to kill off those clans who supported the Italian born, half Polish, Bonnie Prince Charlie's claim to the throne. The Glencoe 'massacre' was a strictly 'scots on scots' affair, between the Campbells and the MacDonalds.

Why don't you get off the fence, and let us really know how you feel about this topic ? PS; are you sure you actually ever were British ?

God Save the King was written to rally support for ( the German ) George II during Bonny Prince Charlie's march on London in 1745. It was not adopted as the national anthem until the Napoleonic wars. The words to Rule Britannia were written by a Scot. And Land of Hope and Glory, is actually to a tune by Elgar, ( see your comment ). My major objection to it is it's being hijacked by the Tories.

Take a look at who wrote Jerusalem, and what it's about. Also, Elgar was English, as is Peter Graham. And last time I looked, Wales was in Britain. My wife has suggested that maybe I should have considered something by Gustav Holst or Frederic Delius,....wonder where they came from ?

Jerusalem, as played by one of the top Championship brass bands. Listen to the version on the Brassed Off soundtrack. If not that, then any good hymn tune in the same genre. As a republican I cannot abide GSTQ, as a national anthem consider the cheese eating surrenders monkeys' choice, the Marseillaise is a truly rousing tune. As for Land of Dope and Tories or Rule Britannia, absolute jingoistic, blue rinse, tripe. Why can't the English find something to match Land of my Fathers ? As for something that 'moves' me, the theme from Schindler's List or the Elgar cello concerto, the version recorded by Jaqueline DuPre. Or my daughter playing flugel on Peter Graham's brass band arrangement of Away In a Manger.

Good science fiction is always well grounded in science fact, the question in this instance is whether you accept or understand enough of Quantum Mechanics to see that as fact. At the atomic level QM does some very spooky, and clearly reproducable, stuff. As Baj alludes to above, some of the 'deeper' stuff does end up as a bit of a mind f&@k.

God moves in mysterious ways, His miracles to perform (?) This 'fact' or 'lie' brings us back to the basic issue about the Bible, as I posted very early in this thread; it's a transliteration of a translation of a translation of a series of 'chinese whispers', constructed to order, and ANYBODY who takes it literally, especially the OT, seriously needs their head examining. And as for contradictions in the Gospels, they are 4 selected 'eye witness' accounts, written originally in 3 different languages, long after the events, and written to emphasise that particular author's perpective, ( which is why only 1 of them mentions the shepherds going to see the baby in the stable ). Your apparent error is in expecting the entire collection to run as a coherent historical narrative. Ultimately religious faith or conviction is another aspect of the freedom for self expression.

Is that 4 or 5 posts on this thread in which you have posted the self same thing ? The mistake you are making is to equate the Bible, in it's entireity, ( the majority of which is a quite aggresive Jewish religious tradition, - which I accept is in places unacceptable ), and the teachings of Jesus, as given out in the New Testament, and upon which the Christian faith is built. Where does Jesus, ( remember he was rejected by the Jews as a false prophet, though funnily enough he is accepted as a true prophet by Islam ), ordain infanticide , rape, murder, etc, etc. This is the God of peace, of love thy neighbour, of forgiveness, of healing and compassion. Which is precisely why the Jews, in their desire for a sword weilding God of wrath rejected him. It is not God's, or Jesus's, fault that people have used the more agressive traditions to argue the wrong message.

For somebody who thought himself a thoroughly rational, scientific, chap, I'm sounding horribly 'happy clappy' today

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. God will permit us to see exactly what He wants us to see, and to discover exactly what He wants us to discover. The decline in faith in western societies has accelerated with the expansion of scientific understanding. However, the more questions we answer, the more we seem to uncover that we don't understand. Which is less likely; (1) that somewhere there is an overseer with a guiding hand taking an 'arms length' benevolent custody of the human spirit, or (2) that life on Earth, ( in this particularly insignificant corner of one of billions of galaxies, in a universe that apparently originated spontaneously from a single point in a 'big bang' where there was previously nothing ), is completely due to a series of random mathematical chances ? However, if it was possible to prove, beyond a doubt, that God existed, it would destroy faith. It would probably also destroy humanity, as we would all, suddenly be aware that we weren't in ultimate control of anything, and effectively no better than lab rats, ( Hitch Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy, anybody? ).

Agreed

1) How many Vikings, Saxons, Celts, etc converted to Christianity, thereby rejecting their ancestral belief systems ? They learnt to believe in the Judeo-Christian God without having Christian parents. 2) Given that the Jewish, Christian, and Muslim 'God's are one and the same, ( IMHO, please don't blow me up as a heretic ), perhaps what you actually have are simply many more varied interpretations of what is essentially the same basic belief. You could extend this to include all monotheistic relgions. And before you get onto the pantheonic structures of the Norse, Roman, or Greek gods, don't Christians have God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirirt ? And don't Catholics also effectively deify Mary ? As has been stated earlier, belief is independant, and quite possibly exclusive of, proof. You are free to choose your personal system of spritual succour, as are we all.

It's funny how certain things can be remembered very clearly, and others slip your mind entirely. I know exactly what I was doing when this match was being played, as I had it on the radio at work whilst we were doing a network installation / upgrade around one of our office buildings, and when the 3rd goal went in I went running up and down the corridor telling the other 2 working for me, and they didn't believe me !

If there IS a God, then on Judgement Day the faithful will gather round saying "See, I told you so". If there isn't all that happens is when you die the switch gets turned off and your chemical constituents get re-cycled, over and over again until, eventually, the Earth will disappear; first into a super-nova, and ultimately into a Black Hole. On that basis, you pay your money and you make your choice.

It was built by Noah and sons of Gallifrey

Why thank you, now stop poking me with that damn spoon.