No, just saying it's interesting. You do also realise that a jury is prepped by the judge, who in this case directed in a way that has never been done, against both binding and persuasive precedent. If anything, the jury would have convicted correctly based on potentially inaccurate law by the judge. But this is what the final appeal will conclude.
Until that happens he is a convicted Rapist, and even if found innocent he will find it very hard to get work as a footballer again in this country.