Unbelievable Jeff

Duplicate post

Exactly this - genuinely he couldn't do much worse. Our players performances and fitness, couldn't be much worse. The results couldn't be much worse. And he might just have a passing interest in football and still get the appointment bang on, like a lot of people on here reckon they could.

At least this is being recognised elsewhere, even if not even if not everyone on here can recognise it. https://www.football365.com/news/f365s-early-loser-mark-hughes-on-the-brink-of-history

:lol: There is just so much fail everytime you post - it's probably why you're so unpopular on here.

What you talking bout Willis? Of course I'd be supportive. You're talking bullocks, again.

Cheers pal (not passive aggressive!).

Cheers pal (not passive aggressive!).

:lol:

What rubbish - I backed all my points up in March with statistics, and then again in May with statistics - I know it's hard to admit you were duped by Hughes when others weren't, but it's OK. I'm sure you'll be correct in the future.

If the question is asked by Always, it's ALWAYS a stupid question. Clues in the name. ALWAYS - Stupid F****** C***

I've been correct all along though haven't I? I called EXACTLY how this would go.

Your sentence made no sense!

What does that mean? Type properly you thick bell.

Not according to Always. Happy clappy c u n t.

The likelihood is he would have - you mug.

Following me again I see. They had a stonewall penalty turned down. You blind as well as stupid?

Wrong, should be 2-2.

Predictable

Maybe it was all Reed...

Only when defending I would have thought.

He's ****. That's why.

It's not a 4-4-2 though.

Gabbi is a wide man (or at least an inside forward). He has never been a 1 up top striker - which is why he was famed in Italy for cutting inside and smashing them in from 25 yards.

I like that team...maybe Vestergaard instead of Hoedt.