sadoldgit

A typical day in Batman's cave. Switch on PC. Trawl internet for anti Muslim stories. Post then on The Saints Web. Job done.

I see you have picked up on your buddies comments about the second world war. I think that is sweet. You are such a well matched couple. I cant even remember the last time I mentioned the Nazis* and as for trawling the Internet for Christian atrocities, that was months ago and only because some you seem to have a problem with the issue that terrorism isn't the sole preserve of Islam. You really are getting desparate now aren't you? Especially as you have more than one person to deal with. How are you getting on with the racists? Still avoiding them? * Did you know that the Nazis were Christians? There I mentioned them again just for you

I see. So even after your first sentence you still feel compelled to use him in support of your agenda. Hmmmm. He clearly has the same self awareness as Hypo if he cant see what he and his buddy did in the Middle East has got a lot to do with our current issues.

The article that you supported states the obvious. And you say I miss the point and lack self awareness.

Yes I have and I have commented on it. The likes if you and your buddies. I know which club I would like to be a member of and it isn't yours. I'll let you go back to avoiding the racists and picking up people who are supporting moderates.

Hypo in supporting Batman post shocker. You can go on with these statements all day long. For example, the more men in a society the larger the problem of sexual assault. But lets just hammer the Muslims again shall we? You have a go at me stating the obvious. Well done for joining the club.

I see you are up to your usual tricks with someone else now. See a pattern yet?

No mate, you are the one who is embarrassing himself. This is more important to you than challenging Islamaphobes. As I said before, you need to think about your priorities. You actually come across as quite a gutless individual. Man up. Pick proper targets eh? ps. there was nothing stopping SM replying that he was only talking about extremists but I don't recall him replying at all.

Because all so often one of your posts will follow one of CB Frys. I am sure you will remember that I picked you up on the same thing a while back to the extent that I thought you might be the same person. You call me on not being self aware yet time and again you have felt the need to have a pop at me (and recently another poster) for posting in support of moderate Muslims. I am amazed that you have not picked up on the overtly racist posts here recently as other posters seem to have "comprehended" what is being said and have challenged the posts themselves. You seem to be very good at pulling up people for stating the obvious but really rubbish at picking up when people are being clearly Islamaphobic. A previous poster even gave you a post reference to help you out!

So then, if you have comprehended this thread perfectly well you will be aware of the overtly racist post that have been made recently and that you have not challenged or commented upon. You also picked me up for supposed saying that all Muslims are not terrorists for the millionth time (or whatever number it was, cant be bothered to check but it was a lot). If you comprehend every that has been said you seem to have failed in this particular case mate. I will help you out. The main body of the post I picked up was - "They blow people up on a huge scale. Women can't leave their homes without covering their heads. Banning basic every day food and drink items." Now if you comprehended what was being said, we have clearly moved on from saying that all Muslims are terrorists. My reply was "I have seen some generalisations in my time but this takes the biscuit. "They" ??? All 1 billion of them???" So I was challenging the inference that not only do "they" blow people up but that all Muslim women cant leave their homes without covering their heads etc. "All." They seemed to me to be huge generalisations, how about you? What do you think? Was I so wrong to pick up on what appeared to me to be a massive case of stereotyping? You seemed to think so. Was that worse than challenging a racist post? It seems in your world, then yes. By the way, feel free to challenge the recent racist posts too!

Were there "obvious" racists post earlier on this thread? Your buddy didn't seem to think so as he asked me to name them, inferring that I was "making things up". You have still avoided the point that you spend more time and energy picking me and others up for supporting the moderates than you have attacking the racist posts, of which there have been plenty lately. Interesting set of priorities you have their mate.

Thank goodness we have you here to remind us every day about the evil in the world Jaime. It is just a shame that you only find that evil amongst certain Muslims.

Different cases. Different circumstances.

You really need to read this thread properly. Also what would be "novel" would be you attacking the racists.

So why bother responding every time I do dearie? Hypo still avoiding the good fight and picking up on posts supporting moderates whilst letting the racist posts go unchallenged. Interesting priorities you have Hypo.

Hi Two Pints, according to a couple of posters here it is a greater crime to defend moderate Muslims than it is to make racists remarks. Go figure.

Got nothing to say about the Islamaphobes then Fry? Talking about fish in a barrel, do they come in your too difficult category? Nice to see you buddy post right after you. You make such a cute couple. Start digging out the people on here that deserve it and you might start gaining some respect instead of continuing your usual trolling behaviour. Neither you nor your partner have taken any of the clear racists on here to task. Why is that? I see to remember you getting all shirty about me not naming names. Well I don't have to because they have outed themselves big time. But you seem to have a bigger problem with someone who says that all Muslims are not to be feared. For someone of your fearsome reputation that shows a particular lack of backbone. I can understand Hypo bottling it by the great CB Fry? Sheesh.

How much of this thread have you read? It would appear that some posters believe that we are at threat from Muslims full stop. Do you have anything to say about the Islamaphobes?

Nope, not big on murder to be honest Whelk.

You don't have to post anything in order to feel superior Hypo.

strolling

For Whelk and Hypo specifically. My response was to the post that said that "They blow people up on a huge scale" etc. There was no part of the post that said he was talking about terrorists. Are you okay with that statement as it stands?

Yes I do. But you seem to think that somehow Belgium shouldn't be including because, and correct me if I am wrong, they haven't been involved in doing nasty things in the Middle East. You asked twice what the Belgiums have done to deserve the bombings did you not?

I (and others) have made the point many many times because it seems that some posters seem to think that we have a problem with all Muslims. Have you not been following the thread?

I see. So you haven't bottled the confrontation with Islamphobic posters then? Hmmm. What part of not all Muslims are terrorists is ill informed Hypo???