sadoldgit

I hope he goes sooner rather than later and that "one of their own" Giggs takes over and just does just as poorly.

Oh the ignamy of losing to Koeman who many here wanted out a couple of weeks ago! Seriously though it isn't losing at home to Southampton that upsets them. It is losing full stop. Maybe they could just about bear losing at home to a "top four" club but certainly not to any team below them.

Nuthouse

We won at Old Trafford so I am not sure what the problem is. Is it better to play well and lose?

Just another day on an Internet football forum.

Lineker is always has a good word to say about us and Shearer is always positive.

Seems that the unimprovable JWP is improving!

The biggest thing for me is that Virgil wants to be here.

So long as you haven't been exterminated

Fancied us today but didn't expect Charlie to pop and do the business at the end. It has been an awesome response by the club and team following the FA Cup exit. Happy days!

badger

national

I grew up with wingers and proper old centre forwards and do miss those days. But if crosses produce fewer goals than playing the ball in from zone 14 then you cant blame coaches for changing their tactics. Not as good to watch though. I think possession is vastly overrated and we are seeing more teams playing on the counter nowadays so for me that is a good thing.

They did indeed.

hygene

Not sure why Tadic is the heading if they are investigating a number of transfers?

Trump becoming President would be really funny for about 5 minutes. Then when reality sets in it would become a really scary proposition.

diaphram

Good point.

dogging

I think we have banned people for their political views though, albeit extreme views. I wonder how we would feel if it were Mohamed Trump, an aspiring leader of a radical Middle East country who was talking about banning Christians from entering the country? Would we still feel happy about him coming here?

They would have a stronger argument if they could come forward with names of black actors who they think should have been nominated and why. Perhaps they have done and I have missed it? They could always hold there own version of the Oscars if they are that bothered. I do think that the Oscars should be decided on a vote by the cinema going public though. Some of the films and performances that have been ignored over the years has been a joke.

The problem is how long to keep hold of a young player if he isn't showing signs of development. As we know, some develop quicker than others and some don't really develop at all. I remember Mick Channon saying that Peter Osgood was the best player he saw when a youngster but as his body developed he lost it a bit. Either you have to be a really good judge of players and their development or really lucky to get it right every time.

I like the thought of banning him just because it would be awesome for the little old UK to ban a possible future President of the US of A. I really don't have a problem with him coming here and showing himself up for the racist bigot he is though.