sadoldgit

Grizzling? You really are a very childish individual aren't you? But it is sweet that you are there for your buddy. As for seeking attention, if I had wanted attention why would I sent him a PM? Yet he chose to make my PM public. Hmmm, who is playing to the gallery here? By the way, replied to Goatbot's post yet? Thought not.

Unfortunately it is much more important than that. It is all about demeaning people and taking the p*ss.

I'm good thank you.

Sadly it would take a hurricane to make mine swing.

If I had posted that there would have been an instant response. What is the expression? Cat got your tongue?

No response Hypo? So unlike you.

Pining for a response? You do have an over inflated sense of your own importance. An apology would have been nice. As for your question, you know as well as I do. Its a shame you don't have the same problem with them that you do with me.

What has this got to do with you?

Not as long as I wait for a response to a PM from you.

There is no way he would make stuff up...oh wait!

I didn't say that yet I am the one who makes things up? Hypocrite.

...

So if I chose to ignore a question I am running away but if you do it somehow is not the same? I see. Yes I could have posted something like that on here but I was trying to save the people who read these threads even more boredom by taking it off thread. What is your problem by the way because most of your posts seem to be concerned with taking the p*ss out of people? Isnt that what is know as trolling? I know a man needs a hobby but surely you can find something better to do with your time? There are plenty of occasions where your name pops up alongside that of Hypos. In fact, if you recall, I did wonder on another thread whether you are both the same person and referred to you as a tag team. I am sure you remember. Because it hasn't happened here recently does mean it hasn't happened. Thanks for pointing out what a question is so succinctly, Perhaps you could explain to Hypo what hyberbole is? You are super clever, as you like to point out by belittling others (you see I am not just a paranoid loon, I also see how you respond to others here). I am sure that you can work it out. Or do you only read selective posts? Even Hypo can work that out so I am sure it cant be too hard for you.

I expect you are right and that many, if not all, would need special care. But there is a big difference in an open door policy and taking care of 3000 children who have lost their parents.

genesis

We do. And one of the biggest wastes of our money are nuclear missiles. Ah well.

Because we are spending a huge amount money on a nuclear deterrent that we will never use and not on helping innocents which will cost peanuts in comparsion. These are children. What are you worried about? That they might be terrorists?

Fulham? Actually forget Fulham. I though they had spent more time in the old Div 1 than they had.

Just on BBC news saying that half of refugees are children. Cameron turns down taking in 3000 children. We don't have the money apparently but are happy to spend money on Trident though.

10 children amongst the dead apparently. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-35430667

The

Wouldn't it depend on the apron though?

You mean the cat is still here? Unlike Rodgers to miss an opportunity like that!

https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xaf1/v/t1.0-9/12650937_10153181687697471_1336780118141000527_n.jpg?oh=2700af7d9d0b3cd862c645a238728d37&oe=5748F665

brook