Jump to content

Harry_SFC

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    3,575
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

10,954 profile views

Harry_SFC's Achievements

  1. He started the season playing crap. Had a purple patch before Tonda was made permanent and now he's gone back to playing crap again. He hides when things get tough like so many of them. He needs to be part of a big reset.
  2. Oh O'Neil isn't anything special and wasn't my first choice but he'd certainly be more inspiring than Tonda is. It hasn't taken us long to turn on Tonda so wouldn't be a huge difference on that front.
  3. The ironic thing is if they'd have paid out for a decent manager in the first place it would've saved them a bit of money from firing a load.
  4. It really became apparent under Juric. For all his faults I like the way he called out Downes and how unfit the players were.
  5. They went for the easy option. Saw the majority of the fans were against it and Tonda started winning games. I would've respected them more for appointing O'Neil to be honest.
  6. I'd imagine so. Charles (hasn't signed a new deal yet, so not looking good) and Scienza for sure.
  7. Peretz, Jelert, THB, Quarshie, Welington, Bragg, Charles, Matsuki, Fellows, Scienza, Stewart. Lots of changes needed.
  8. There are a core of players who I've just had enough of. Downes, THB, Wood, Stephens, Manning, Bazunu, Aribo, Bree, Fraser, Archer. I'd probably replace Armstrong at the end of the season too. We need to build the squad around players like Charles, Jander, Fellows, Scienza and Quarshie (yes I think we should persevere with him).
  9. He's quite the opposite to Manning in the fact he's actually probably too aggressive. But I'd prefer that to a player who constantly stands off like Manning does. Oh and he isn't lazy and doesn't always pass it backwards. So yes whilst he's not great he is certainly a better option in this division.
  10. Agreed. It'll be good for his confidence, he seems like a good guy, just not very good at goalkeeping. Just shows though what a pathetic defence we have as well though.
  11. As everyone could have predicted.
  12. It's a real shame because he's clearly a decent goalscorer.
  13. We are much more stable with 3 at the back remember...
  14. Why is that a good thing? Hull are depleted. Coventry were depleted. It matters not a jot.
  15. Is he the worst left back we've had? Don't get me wrong we've had some shit ones but he is just lazy, wasteful, has terrible awareness, positioning is awful, can't tackle and can't head the ball as he constantly makes a back for attackers. Thoughts?
×
×
  • Create New...