Master Bates Posted 17 August, 2009 Share Posted 17 August, 2009 Was reading an article in the Business section of todays Echo about suppliers and local businesses asking the club to provide credit checks etc as they think we're still poor :smt081 It's on the website now however can't get the link as the site keeps crashing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Bates Posted 17 August, 2009 Author Share Posted 17 August, 2009 http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/business/4548916.Businesses__unaware__of_Saints_takeover/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivan Katalinic's 'tache Posted 17 August, 2009 Share Posted 17 August, 2009 Don't they read this forum??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S-Clarke Posted 17 August, 2009 Share Posted 17 August, 2009 ...''“There are new owners, a new executive chairman. All our previous debts have been paid off and we are able to operate as a business in good health once again,”'' Should make that a sticky...good read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maddog24g Posted 17 August, 2009 Share Posted 17 August, 2009 Maybe some of these were creditors who didn't get paid in full after administration. Can't blame them for not wanting to get left holding the bag again after what went on just recently Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krissyboy31 Posted 17 August, 2009 Share Posted 17 August, 2009 Misleading title TBH. Many of the businesses, small suppliers etc. probably lost money when SLH went into administration, some as creditors having to take a small percentage of what they were owed after Fry had divided up the pot of money. They are now looking after their own interests and ensuring that that will not happen again. In any case, any new firm requiring credits terms from a supplier would have to go through similar financial checks and as Cortese says, SFC are now a new company. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastleighSoulBoy Posted 17 August, 2009 Share Posted 17 August, 2009 Maybe some of these were creditors who didn't get paid in full after administration. Can't blame them for not wanting to get left holding the bag again after what went on just recently Misleading title TBH. Many of the businesses, small suppliers etc. probably lost money when SLH went into administration, some as creditors having to take a small percentage of what they were owed after Fry had divided up the pot of money. They are now looking after their own interests and ensuring that that will not happen again. In any case, any new firm requiring credits terms from a supplier would have to go through similar financial checks and as Cortese says, SFC are now a new company. Exactly my thoughts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now