Farmer Saint Posted 8 hours ago Posted 8 hours ago 3 minutes ago, tdmickey3 said: Which bracket are you in Do they have a bracket for people with low IQs?
tdmickey3 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago 18 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: Do they have a bracket for people with low IQs? Maybe, but I doubt it goes low enough for Osgimpvaldo
Osvaldorama Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago What’s quite funny is that the economists article still features a chart crime. The log scale hides how bad the figures truly are. If you adjust to a linear scale, it looks like this:
Farmer Saint Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago Just now, Osvaldorama said: What’s quite funny is that the economists article still features a chart crime. The log scale hides how bad the figures truly are. If you adjust to a linear scale, it looks like this: Well yes, that's what a log scale does, and it says it on the last one you posted? Sorry, not sure what your point is here?
badgerx16 Posted 7 hours ago Posted 7 hours ago (edited) From a REDDIT discussion - quotes taken from the Economist article ; "This suggested Afghans are convicted of sex crimes at seven times the British rate—a far cry from Mr Timothy’s “over 20 times”, but disturbing nevertheless (see chart)." "here age-standardised analysis exists for those countries, the over-representation shrinks, as in Britain, but it does not vanish. Looking at convictions by ethnicity, rather than nationality, is more reassuring. The Ministry of Justice produces detailed data on prosecutions and convictions by age, sex and ethnicity. We used these to repeat our age-standardised analysis, for the same 2020-22 window. Our results suggested that Pakistani, other Asian and other non-black minority men were no more likely to have been convicted of sex offences than white British men." "And the numbers need to be kept in perspective. In 2010-12 Afghan nationals were convicted of 92 sex crimes; in 2022-24 the total was 102. Ten additional sex crimes, after the Afghan population has roughly tripled, is not an epidemic." " Edited 7 hours ago by badgerx16 2
Farmer Saint Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 31 minutes ago, badgerx16 said: From a REDDIT discussion - quotes taken from the Economist article ; "This suggested Afghans are convicted of sex crimes at seven times the British rate—a far cry from Mr Timothy’s “over 20 times”, but disturbing nevertheless (see chart)." "here age-standardised analysis exists for those countries, the over-representation shrinks, as in Britain, but it does not vanish. Looking at convictions by ethnicity, rather than nationality, is more reassuring. The Ministry of Justice produces detailed data on prosecutions and convictions by age, sex and ethnicity. We used these to repeat our age-standardised analysis, for the same 2020-22 window. Our results suggested that Pakistani, other Asian and other non-black minority men were no more likely to have been convicted of sex offences than white British men." "And the numbers need to be kept in perspective. In 2010-12 Afghan nationals were convicted of 92 sex crimes; in 2022-24 the total was 102. Ten additional sex crimes, after the Afghan population has roughly tripled, is not an epidemic." " Still too high mind. I think this is an issue with living under Taliban rule for so long - behaviours become indoctrinated and endemic in society.
badgerx16 Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Farmer Saint said: Still too high mind. I think this is an issue with living under Taliban rule for so long - behaviours become indoctrinated and endemic in society. There are many statisticsl twists to this. One is that males between 18 and 35 commit proportionally far more sexual assaults than the total male population, and a large proportion of the immigrants fall into that category, but whether any individual immigrant is more likely to offend than a Brit, I don't know. It is certainly more likely to be reported in the media. 2
Weston Super Saint Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, Osvaldorama said: What’s quite funny is that the economists article still features a chart crime. The log scale hides how bad the figures truly are. If you adjust to a linear scale, it looks like this: It's FOUR years out of date. Have you got the current figures, or even last year's figures?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now