hypochondriac

I mentioned Fraser, I can't see us signing Downes, certainly not THB and Rothwell has been crap. We could do a deal for Brookes but I'm underwhelmed by his performances on the whole. Like I said, I was working on the basis that what Saint Cam said was true and we were skint. Given that scenario, my point was we can still put out a half decent team. If we have more funds then we definitely need a Downes replacement and a replacement if Aribo leaves and possibly another striker option.

Not sure I agree with you there. Presumably gk will be an upgrade If we get a THB replacement in and possibly a new rb that defence isn't hugely different from now Agree we need a Downes replacement but Charles will have had another year of growth and will hopefully have some improvements. Smallbone and Armstrong have been consistently in the team all year. Amo Ameyew was unlucky imo to not get more games this year and should be another year older so no reason he can't be successful and you'd have Fraser there as well hopefully and then if we are going with 11 rather than 12 you'd have Stewart up top who may be an upgrade on Adams for all we know. I also forgot about Edozie who would probably play too. No doubt we will get in a couple of attacking loans in or a canny winger signing to replace the ones who leave but I don't see what's so horrendous about that team. I think with a couple of additions that could make the playoffs again.

Good spot! My guess is we will be aiming for playoffs next year. I definitely want some of the young players to have more of an opportunity next year if we stay down. We definitely need a few more, I was working more on the basis like some have claimed that we are skint and even if that's true, we'd be able to put out a team of half decent players.

That's how I see it. New gk Bree Stephens new cb Manning Charles Smallbone Armstrong Dibling Amo-Ameyaw Ballard Stewart Maybe bring in Fraser on reduced wages, loan in a decent dm again, an Am and a winger and a Mara replacement. Sell lose or loan off the wage bill McCarthy Onuachu Caleta Carr Bella Kotchap Lyanco Perraud Sulemana Adams Kwp Bednarek Aribo Mara That should reduce things significantly.

Proper bellend.

Didn't he bring up his wife? If what I said was true then it doesn't seem like his previous marriage is anything to particularly crow about given how it ended.

And yet I wonder if we would be in the position we are now if what I outlined had happened before the end of last year? I am certain that wouldn't be the case. Release the hostages and surrender. You claim it's not that simple and yet it still hasn't happened over half a year later.

"last chance" to free Israeli hostages. What do you think will happen if that last chance expires? It's been simple really. Free the hostages, Hamas surrenders and let's see how long the war continues for. You can guarantee in that scenario that Israel won't be enjoying the support of anyone in the international community if it continues after that. They could have done this at any point since October but they won't will they. Wonder why?

This Israeli lot are so unreasonable wanting their hostages back. I'm glad that Hamas are so reasonable and so keen to end this that they aren't using the hostages they took as political bargaining chips. Oh wait...

This is about the thickest response there could possibly have been to Lighthouse's post. Just when you think he couldn't look dumber, he says something to surpass himself. I shouldn't underestimate you soggy.

Well yes apart from the fact that quite a few of them are evil cunts.

Where did I say you can't respond how you like? You just made that up. You can respond however you want but you don't see me whining on about other people being childish or asking for grown up discussion when you've thrown insults around continuously. You're right though you do get on my nerves because you keep referring to me when I wasn't even in the discussion. Like I said, I just think you're wrong and you think that people who disagree with you are evil or cunts. You can't have any sort of reasonable discussion with someone who is like that. You're clearly just very angry about this particular topic and you can't accept that not everyone agrees with you and you're taking it out on me because I've been one of the most vocal about disagreeing with you. You'll probably just call me an idiot, a moron or a cunt again now but I think that just underlines your hypocrisy.

Exactly. Sick to death of people on here putting words in my mouth for things I haven't said. It's pathetic.

"shown true colours". You're a proper bellend mate. You've flung invective my way at every opportunity on this thread yet have the gall to call other people childish and suggesting they post in a more grown up manner on a poxy Web forum? You've got some brass neck I'll give you that. Are you really incapable of differentiating between the content of a post and the attitude of the person posting it? The difference is that I and other people disagree with you, you and soggy think the people that disagree with you are evil. I happen to find the supercilious, morally superior posting style of soggy and the way that he very obviously hunts the Internet and concentrates solely on one side of the conflict and then purports to be talking about both sides to be very amusing and worthy of mockery and I'll respond how I choose thanks. If it suits you to believe that I'm doing it because I find dead children funny then I'm afraid that says rather more about you and the caricature you've built up in your head of those on this thread who disagree with you.

There once was a man named Russell Who was vegan so lacked certain muscles For possession he cared And had lego for hair And with Sunak he had quite a tussle Almost works.