
Fabrice29
Subscribed Users-
Posts
2,110 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Fabrice29
-
Also, on this point, and it’ll be my last because it’s even more dull discussing it, have some self respect ffs. You’ve watched this guy and other players in this squad for years now consistently not give you value for money. Don’t reward them now just because the level they’ve dragged us down to is lower. We shouldn’t be entertaining any of them tbh, let alone making one captain and another the key striker to our success. Like I said, have some self respect and start demanding better, not the same at a lower level.
-
‘at this level Che will score goals but we won’t find anyone else’ bloody hell how much has our bad recruitment dragged the hope down of the fans here 😂 If this level is so bad that even he can score then even us can recruit someone else to replace him surely. I’m not even raising the fact that at this level Che has only scored double figures once either. Because you’re giving him extra money for no benefit to us. Extra years on his deal should mean extra value for any transfer. If you’re selling him at 10m anyway then do it now, before you pay him more money.
-
Take a step back and ask yourself how you've got to a stage were you genuinely believe this please. You've watched him over the last few years just like we all have.
-
You fail to see how a striker with a new contract and a few years left is worth more than one with less than a year left? This is our last possible chance to get some money for someone who has been underwhelming. He's not a superstar we can't play without and this isn't a league that only a select few players can score in. Kieffer Moore and Andreas Weimann have scored 20 plus goals in this league in the last few years. Rake in the money and back yourself to find someone else, is the only sensible option for those running the club.
-
It makes it a hell of a lot harder to offload him when you inevitably concluded he’s not good enough though. We’re being offered plus 10 million for someone we don’t think is good enough for the level we aspire to be at. And I’m not going to get into Che bashing because I like him generally but didn’t he score 3 goals in a couple of starts this time last season as well? He ended up on 5 PL goals. He’s consistently gone through massive form swings and that’s what I’m personally bored of. The one good thing about the relegation is the reset we’ve had. Off the pitch we’ve made positive, exciting changes and I don’t see why we can’t do that on the pitch as well. I personally see Che as a symbol of our issues for a while now, amongst others, and I don’t see why we need to keep people around who consistently underwhelm for us when presented with a chance to cash out and have a possibly exciting new look on the pitch.
-
Even if we struggle to replace his goals at this level (doubtful based on some utter turd players have scored 20 plus goals at this level recently and also doubtful because Che has an incredible ability to go through very big form swings and he’s no guarantee of goals over a season)… are you not bored of watching him start up front for us yet? We certainly shouldn’t be offering new deals to a player who has consistently underwhelmed at the level we aspire to be at. Have some joy in your life my friend, embrace a new striker, it might be fun.
-
I just love that the fact you’d be utterly perplexed if a Championship striker had turned us down whilst we were in the PL for the same reasons. Staggering levels of arrogance and no self awareness.
-
The reality is that Che is going to probably go to Everton or somewhere else in the Prem because it's a step up. I don't remember us targeting a Championship striker in January and if we did I cant imagine Blackmore, Glen and any other dope were peddling a narrative that they shouldn't be. I do remember some of them questioning the current Chelsea starting striker's pedigree though.
-
That Glen fella from the Saints Podcast and Adam Blackmore amongst those peddling the idea that Che shouldn't be going to Everton because they are so bad. Up there with the JWP regretting the move to West Ham nonsense. Really arrogant narrative to push and hilarious because they'd be the first to imply any striker moving from the Championship to us last season would have been a step up.
-
We're Definitely not Obsessed with Women's Football, Honestly
Fabrice29 replied to AlexLaw76's topic in The Lounge
Please stop constantly reminding us how interested you are in it. That's twice now you've told us you're watching it. -
We're Definitely not Obsessed with Women's Football, Honestly
Fabrice29 replied to AlexLaw76's topic in The Lounge
Whatever this manly man was on about. -
We're Definitely not Obsessed with Women's Football, Honestly
Fabrice29 replied to AlexLaw76's topic in The Lounge
Like I said, you're both so tough and burley and no amount of anyone daring to watch, show interest or even say they enjoy it will change that. The desperation is strong. -
We're Definitely not Obsessed with Women's Football, Honestly
Fabrice29 replied to AlexLaw76's topic in The Lounge
Viewing figures? I probably wouldn't judge interest in a World Cup final based on attendance at a Saints game no, men or women. -
We're Definitely not Obsessed with Women's Football, Honestly
Fabrice29 replied to AlexLaw76's topic in The Lounge
Yes, interest levels should definitely be judged by number of posts on a message board set up by fans of a football club that has nothing to do with todays final. And flags. -
We're Definitely not Obsessed with Women's Football, Honestly
Fabrice29 replied to AlexLaw76's topic in The Lounge
You're so manly and you shouldn't let anyone forget about that xxx -
It's not that people don't take an interest in reading links, it fills time right and is mildly interesting but they should be taken with a pinch of salt because at best any links/leaks are heavily embellished. It's the people that crave links or use links and lack of links as evidence of what is or isn't happening. "Lack of links recently for this position is a concern" is my favourite.
-
Daily reminder that Nixon consistently uses us as column filler and is consistently used by agents to link their players to clubs when needed. How are Breckin and Stewart getting on for us?
-
Which is exactly why we should cash in before his contract ends and we are back at the level that we don't think he can start at.
-
Said before that the moment we weren’t in for Piroe was obvious when Martin specifically made a point about Armstrong being able to play the Piroe role. Wouldn’t be doing that if you were then trying to bring in Piroe himself. BUT LINKS! Everyone loves a link. Links are everything. We need more links, not enough links.
-
Apart from the pretty big and significant sign of the manager specifically stating on more than one occasion this week that if Che leaves we will replace him, of course.
-
Cannot fathom anyone of us being upset by Che leaving. Decent player, good guy, maybe he would score the goals to promote us at this level but so bored of watching him and the majority of the squad that aren’t young players. Him, JWP, Stephens, Armstrong x 2, Bednarek, KWP and probably others too..cool if you stay but I’ve seen it all now and it’s not that good that it’s worth being upset about. 👋
-
People getting worried over ‘the lack of links’ will never not be funny.
-
He was sacked.
-
She wouldn't want the job. Hate to break it to you.
-
Yeah I know what you said and what you were talking about. I was confused that you seem to think it was an issue?