Psycrow

No.

I might not like it? I don't mind at all. Yes I'd like us to make the playoffs, but I'm also not mentally disturbed, so I can see the club is on the right track and in the right hands. Its very easy to pick and choose the games you want to include in your statistics. In my stats I think I'll take the second 10 games "out of the equation" as I can remember at the time a lot of the people on this board saying "We just need one win for confidence and then we'll go on a run". So that run was obviously artificial and shouldn't be included in any stats regarding performance. So well done Mr. Pardew. The team has come on brilliantly since the first 10 games of the season.

My point exactly

I disproved your FACT about the 2 halfs of the season. We have won more points per game since Dec 5th than we did before hand. You can't argue with that FACT. The first 10 games of the season was poor, and then we went on a great run. To say that the whole season has gone down hill because that great run didn't continue is deluded. I mean there's a period in the season were we won 6 games in a row. By your logic Pardew should never be allowed to lose a game again after that under punishment of the sack. I don't place any more credence in my FACTS than I do yours. My FACTS are simply to point out how absolutely arbitrary and pointless the **** your spouting is.

How on earth do figures that indiciate and INCREASE in the number of points per game indicate a lack of progress? Your random choosing of stats to suit your argument are pointless. In our first 4 games in march our record was WON 2 LOST 2. Since then, the following four games show a record of WON 3 DREW 1. Fantastic progress!!! That's more than a 50% improvement!!!! If you're idea of a lack of progress is not keeping up a fantastic run and going into any kind of slump, then you don't just know **** all about football, you're simply deluded.

Well if you're going to look at only 1 statistic that suits your own agenda you can prove anything... BUT... let me take the dates YOU brought up and look at them. Today, we have a total of 64 points from 38 games played. An average of 1.6842 points per game. On the 5th December we had a total of 32 points from 20 games played. An average of 1.6 points per game. Now that seems like progress to me!.. and imagine, its in the exact same "period when these excuses stopped washing". You ****.

Am, you realise he was being cynical right?

one more!!!

75 minutes actually, but don't let facts get in the way.

What do you mean first? Is there something you're not telling us?

get in

Just remember for next year when they tell us that we've signed Rivaldo

you should see the tripe they've come up with over here this morning.

This is what I meant http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=21422 I didn't want to ruin it like Wheels did because I'd bet dollars to donuts that someone would have fallen for it. I was impressed though, not the typical fodder that's usually trundled out by news channels and websites... something plausible and imaginative.

That's what I was referring to in my thread here http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=21421 I didn't want to say what it was though... guaranteed someone would have fallen for it! Very imaginative though, and somewhat plausible. Ruined all my fun wheels!!!

I'm impressed... and waiting patiently.

Thought you were seeing things for a while there Badger Thanks for the link St Landrew Good article. Lots of good quotes and great to hear him saying the things he's saying. I hadn't realised he'd been out of work for close to two years before taking the job, didn't seem like that. At least we know from that, that he's not to the type of guy to just take a wage packet, because I'm sure he would have had offers. Very pleasing, very pleasing

Am... I realise this thread has changed into a different debate... But did you post the link to the right article? I see no mention of next season, 3 years or the premiership on the link you sent.

Did you even read the whole thread? They're on opposite sides of the argument more or less.

He's here all week, try the beef

I think there might be a few apologies owed to TDD here today. Not for people who didn't hear booing and didn't know it happened, but from the people who simply disbelieve it because TDD brought it up and the accusations that he only did so to cause trouble. I watched it on TV. I heard it. I thought the same thing as TDD thought. Even before Sky even mentioned it, I thought to myself that I couldn't believe they were booing NC. To be fair to Sky when they brought it up, no one said the word "booing", they simply said he was getting a distinctly cooler reception than ML got. It wasn't until HT and FT that the so called trouble between NC and AP was mentioned.

Good to hear it was for the waves. They weren't seen on the TV and the possibility wasn't even mentioned by sky.

No one's moaning. TDD started the thread here to say that it was uncalled for. I heard it while watching the match on TV and thought the same thing. This is nothing to do with performance, the team or complaining about every little detail. This is to do with some muppets booing the chairman who had played a major part in getting their team to Wembley while at the match. Its like booing Santa on Christmas Morning when he arrives with the presents because you heard a rumour he was a little harsh with the elves.

Bloody rain

I thought I heard a murmuring of boos when he appeared on the screen. Hard to tell watching on TV. Sky definitely played it up though. Media making a mountain out of a molehill again with regards the Pardew situation.