70's Mike

not sure why you are concerned if they are embarassment or not. i do not think Wotte will be the subject of their banners this time. even if we go undefeated until the end of the season it does not alter the opinion of many , that Lowe needs to go and take Wilde with him

bet they did not have a pie and pint

As an old married man the Internet allows be to keep up with developments without finding excuses to go to the Pub. If i was still 18 or not married I would probably not post on here and find out things through the pub grapevine. But i am not even sure if Pubs EXIST IN THE FORMAT they did 25 years ago

steve macclaren

Do not think so

i think it is a Stock Exchange requirement

Cannot be long before these and the statement to the LSE are due out. Trying to find out when last years figures were released . Any one know

there was a guy with clogs on selling programmes on Saturday

exactly keep same team and take game to them in a positive way ,

but with no significant increase in income, has playing him and paying him pushed us closer or even in to admin. If not , why did we not play him all season

totally agree Um, i am fed up of hearing there is no one else, we had no choice , what else could we do ? there are always choices problem is Rupert has made the wrong ones for the last 5 years

why does the club have to be run on a day to day basis by a shareholder ?

christ surely saints are not responsible for the credit crunch

so , for my simple mind, are you saying we were in sh1tcreek but are not now and that is why we are playing these older players. It does not stack up

May be it was the Echo staff taking a sneaky look through the blinds at the protest yesterday that upset Rupert.

i suppose the issue is that he and others had to go on loan because we could not afford to pay them, apparently. I agree we have to pay him now BUT is that payment going to push us into admin or not. If it does not have we been conned for the first half of the season

was not aware the Echo supported the club financially ?

Only because you are letting it. I heard no chants against Wotte on the march, during the game or after the game , Did You ? Next you will be saying that the 2 kids who had Real Madrid shirts on ( they were 5 and 7 years old) detracted from the march

no one has really answered how we can afford Saga, Euell and co NOW but could not, apparently, 4 weeks ago ?

Sums up my view , supporting the team and wanting Lowe and Co out are not incompatiable

Sort of agree but we know we had no money , it is about how we have spent what we have? we were told it had to be youth because money was so tight so explain the change over the last 2 weeks Have we just been conned into believing we had no money ? Are we so broke that yesterday was the last time we will see that team? Something does not stack up

The answer to the original question is the crux of what is going on ? Are we saying we could afford money to fund Rupert's dream ? Are we so broke that bring Saga back, playing Skacel and Euell now makes no difference? Have we in facted been conned by the pr machine from SMS.

imo there are to many keyboard supporters on both sides of the fence.

no problem

BUT we do not need Euell running around like a spring chicken, if he plays like he did yesterday he will being doing the job which has been beyond Patterson, Robertson, Peckaert and DMG roughing up their defence and bring others into the game