CB Fry

You've not read the Brexit thread then? Verbal is on that quite a lot. This Tory government is absolutely appalling and Magic Grandad, Red Book McDonnell, Dopey Diane and Stalinist Seamus Milne and the rest can barely lay a glove on them. Pathetic.

Quite. He was obviously either a liar or a fantasist, either way completely full of sh it, which was apparent to anyone with a brain from the get-go. Frankly it's insane to think anyone would be mourning his absence from this forum. Until, of course you see which lunatic it is fawning over him like some helpless defenceless victim.

Don't you spend your time on this forum accusing people of having multiple accounts/being the same person? Also known as lying. So how about you leave off the condescension because there ain't no bigger bullsh itter on this forum than you.

LOLZ.

I love Ian Dunt.

It was pretty obvious he wasn't what we needed and was a dreadful signing. That was clear at the time and so it proved.

...

So Gallagher needs a few seasons in League One? Sounds good to me.

Looks like percentages of constituencies rather than percentages of the electorate in those constituencies. Applying FPTP rules to a nationwide referendum. Or, in other words, horsesh it.

Bob Higgins has more genes in common with crabs than he does with you or me. Now that is a scientific fact - there's no real evidence for it - but it is a fact.

As Shurlock says, Major famously received the highest number of votes ever in a general election. Ever. And against all odds. Hardly the performance of the biggest loser in history. You seem to be forgetting the shower of sh it that led the party after that. Hague, Michael Howard and of course the beyond pathetic Iain Duncan Smith, possibly the worst leader of any political party in the history of humanity. Weird why you haven't mention how utterly dreadful IDS was. He took appalling leadership, the total inability to deliver a conference speech, participate in PMQs or do anything remotely useful and took it to an art form. The most miserable performance of a born loser history has ever known. Why have you forgotten him? He was absolutely laughably fu cking useless. I mean, what a loser.

He tweeted about Gallagher to Stoke earlier.

Farage was talking about how it "wasn't over" if Leave lost narrowly 48-52 on the night of the referendum. Of course, once his side won it all changed.

Not sure we have to conflate the two. I don't want us to waste money on Ings. I couldn't give a flying if Gallagher is sold to a Championship club as it is already pretty clear that is his level, and if we had announced a player with that record as a new signing this summer we'd all be non-plussed.

To be fair Vestergard and Moi looked decent enough. There's hope.

Well my 10 year daughter had a useful introduction to the life of a Saints supporter at her first match. Dear me.

They can whistle for any severance payment.

Carefully read this. As I said you write horsesh it. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/27/upshot/trump-losing-college-educated-whites-he-never-won-them-in-the-first-place.html And as Ernest Hemingway once said "Guided Missile is a complete bellend."

You're a careful reader, so carefully read the post I quoted from you which was a direct reply from you to me. Go back. Read carefully. There it is. Not a reply to anyone else. To me. That's kinda why I thought you were replying to me because it was a reply to me. I read it real careful, like. And I've carefully read my post and I'm struggling to see where I've suggested you are a racist. But I've read you carefully and I am seeing someone desperate to deny something they haven't even been accused of in the first place. How strange. Anything else you want to deny being? I am absolutely delighted to put on the record that I don't think you're racist at all. Lastly. You write horsesh it, that's all I've said. The link between college education and propensity to vote for Clinton is huge, undeniable, unavoidable. Read this carefully you old definitely not a racist person. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/behind-trumps-victory-divisions-by-race-gender-education/

One, that doesn't disprove my point that a candidate's "base" is not, obviously, every single person that voted for them. Two, not sure why you using "white" as a qualifier in a mixed race country like the US is. Thirdly, just a cursory look shows that across the "college educated vs not" divide, more voted for Clinton by a significant margin. Linked, quoted. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/behind-trumps-victory-divisions-by-race-gender-education/ ..... In the 2016 election, a wide gap in presidential preferences emerged between those with and without a college degree. College graduates backed Clinton by a 9-point margin (52%-43%), while those without a college degree backed Trump 52%-44%. This is by far the widest gap in support among college graduates and non-college graduates in exit polls dating back to 1980. For example, in 2012, there was hardly any difference between the two groups: College graduates backed Obama over Romney by 50%-48%, and those without a college degree also supported Obama 51%-47%. .... Any chance you will ever post anything that isn't horsesh it?

That bollo cks is straight out of the "a policeman can't arrest you if he's not wearing his hat" urban myth factory.

I think SOG is a season behind. I think under Claude there was something about how many chances we created but didn't put away but last season we were just sh it all over the pitch.

That's because we want more than a free trade deal.

Its here on his special slide. I'm sure someone who knows more than me will plot that Japan deal but I guess somewhere near Korea and Canada.

Pretty certain that we can have a free trade deal with the EU and not have to follow the rulebook. Believe that has been on offer from Barnier from the very start of the process. I imagine right now the EU are thinking, go on, take that option and make our fu cking day.