St Landrew

You having a pessimistic weekend or something..?

Not keen on them, as I always end up accidentally pressing one of the side buttons, and lose the entire page I'm looking at.

I hope you mean next August, otherwise we'll not be promoted in 2011.

Oh, get it over and done with. You might be waiting a long time unless AP lights a fire under the team.

Off to HT chat and 2nd half thread please

HT. Poor. Some quiet boos, but in all honesty, I think the crowd are being kind.

A few individual supporters are making themselves heard. I think we might concede if we're not careful.

Merrington - Pardew will have to kick a few backsides at HT.

I'm not sure the majority of the squad we had for the last few seasons were worth persisting with. They had been beaten down, time and again, and probably need to be broken up, if only for the individual players sake. Besides, Pardew had his own ideas on who he could work with. Lee Barnard nearly scores.

Antonio seems prepared to up the tempo. Crowd have come alive.

It depends whether you're prepared to understand that it took time to wipe out the old defeatist mentality of the previous few seasons, or you just think it is all a hoax. Quite obviously, the correct mentality is vital. As I write this, Saints are building a little pressure on Stockport.

Saints are slumbering. Either the team need to get the tempo raised, or HT needs to come, with Pardew to do some serious talking.

Schneiderlin shoots..!

Anyone who is listening to the radio is either tuned to Radio Solent or whatever Stockport are covered by. You won't get local radio coverage via the internet.

I sense that, once again, Saints are not playing at a high enough tempo. We should be all over this opposition.

Just heard the Solent commentator mention Holmes to Mills which took me back to the early 80s.

Lambert shoots after 6 seconds.

Comments here please.

Comments here please. COYR

Comments here please COYR.

Idiots.

You're in danger of moving from good grammar and spelling into apostrophe nazi territory. Most of the time, posters use sufficient punctuation, although occassionally, I read a sentence, so long, I nearly asphyxiate from the lack of commas and full-stops. I don't mind typos in the slightest. Anyone can press the occasional wrong key and not noticed on a read through, but obvious bad grammar does my head in..! Here are classic examples that anyone should know, including all football pundits: Could have, should have, would have and not could of, should of, would of. It's why the contraction of said words are could've, should've, would've. Those things, not them things Better than, and not better then. Did and not done, as in... he did his work. Did well and not done good, as in... the boy did well. And when someone asks you how you are feeling, the reply is, [when it is true] I'm well, not I'm good. You can decide whether you are well, but other people will decide whether you are good. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9zj9OKyczs Flick straight to 2m 50s, and carry on for as long as you like. Screenplay writers in the USA actually know the difference, even if the general population don't.

When I used to be in a position as a manager with hire and fire capacity, I used to reject immediately anyone without a reasonable command of English grammar and spelling, while sifting through applications forms or CVs. Of course, if a person noted that he or she was dyslexic, then these criteria were obviously not so important in selection. The ability to communicate effectively is certainly amongst the most important virtues anyone can have, whether it be in speech or the written word. It's an automatic entry card.

It's peculiar, but either people have come to that last post, pressed the link, and don't understand what it entails, or people are simply not interested in potentially the greatest discovery since fire.

Apetite suppressant, apparently.