JohnnyFartPants

Well he has said he wants to buy a British club, and we are British. The club does have everything set up and ready to go after a cash injection. The biggest stumbling block is that the same could be said of many other UK clubs, so while it is possible, it is by no means probable.

American Hard Gums. That is where it's at.

Who was that person on Saints Forever that was a bit like that? Was it Rory?

This was a very funny day on here watching this person go mental.

Can I have one on Saturday and one on Sunday? I will pay up in advance without any proof if that helps?

Some might think the same about spending huge money getting a bloke with "celeb" status to come in to a venue and "lay some toons down."

Last in the series last night. I hope they make a second series.

Okay. It was nice proving you wrong all day. xx

By your own earlier correction, should that not then be Shane's Language Services? Silly Shane.

We must be able to offset their domineering of us as a major player in our future atrocities, if we try!

Not really. I was expressing language you would understand, not a language you owned or one which belonged to you. HTH Oh, no capital letter needed for "dull", okay?

Thanks. You did bottle it though, didn't you?

Or translated into Shane language, "Please keep things simple for my dull brain."

It really wasn't. It is in no way implied.

I see you are losing your bottle lately and removing your racist comments after a brief time. It is like watching an education grow, one that I feel partly responsible for

Moving the goalpost, also known as raising the bar, is an informal logically fallacious argument in which evidence presented in response to a specific claim is dismissed and some other (often greater) evidence is demanded. In other words, after an attempt has been made to score a goal, the goalposts are moved to exclude the attempt. This attempts to leave the impression that an argument had a fair hearing while actually reaching a preordained conclusion. Moving the goalpost can also take the form of reverse feature creep, in which features are eliminated from a product, and the goal of the project is redefined in such a way as to exclude the eliminated features. Bella Donna claims that Sybil Antwhisper, her room-mate, is not sharing the housework equitably. Sybil tells Bella to go away and itemize and record who does what household tasks. If Bella can show that she does more housework than Sybil, then Sybil will mend her ways. A week passes and Bella shows Sybil clear evidence that Sybil does not "pull her weight" around the house. Sybil (the advocate) responds: "That's all very well, but I have more work and study commitments than you do – you should do more housework than me... it's the total work of all kinds that matters, not just housework." In this example the implied agreement between Bella and Sybil at the outset was that the amount of housework done by both parties should be about the same. When Sybil was confronted by the evidence however, she quickly and unilaterally "changed the terms of the debate". She did this because the evidence was against her version of events and she was about to lose the argument on the issue as originally defined. By "moving the goalposts" Sybil is seeking to change the terms of the dispute to avoid a defeat on the original issue in contention. HTH

You dim little attention whore.

Please tell me the rules, once and for all. Is it that when you make a comment, it is fact and can't be challenged but if others do it can be? Now the goalposts seem to have moved yet again. Now it seems if you agree with a poster those "facts" can't be challenged either.

Are we entitled to our own opinions again now, as earlier you said that unless I agreed with you I should put you on ignore as what you said was the only facts allowed? I wish you would stop all this changing.

To be fair he never even touched on expressing a desire that Stu got cancer, only that he thought Jade got it for being a racist.

Something along the lines of, "And Stu, if those proddy birds show you their boobies they may want phucking, so use a condom, got it?"

Indeed. Having said that, you can with most coutries, only most are a bit more grown up about it. Why don't we pass the buck and blame the Romans?

The man that time forgot. Harry Hill has a great comedy delivery and is also a qualified doctor. He obviously has a higher IQ than 80 and he cracks funnies accordingly. Maybe you just don't get him because you are either way too clever or perhaps the other extreme. I know which direction I am thinking of.

400 you say?

It doesn't matter what room we are in to be fair. Nobody should feel that they are perhaps nothing more than scum. Scum is a disgusting by product of dirt and excrement and it should be thought about very, very carefully before it is levied in anyone's direction, okay?