JohnnyFartPants

Well done. You have invented an issue. Fair play though, it is a total one off. I have never heard any other fotball team manager on the radio. He is really going out on a limb and being totally bonkers, and clever you spotted it.

=D>

Yes but in fairness they are giving you the chance to moan about them moaning and you are only ever happy when moaning. It's a win/win scenario, surely?

All quite amusing but it's nice to read that some of their lot wanted us saved, but beneath them. That is the true spirit of rivalry, unlike a lot of co(k lunches on both sides of the fence.

To be fair,if the rumour about Pompey is as accurate as all the takeover rumours about Southampton have been in just the last 3 weeks, lets alone the last 2 years then right now they have no need to start worrying. My immediate thought on reading this post was that ITK posters could no longer bleat it about us so have switched ends of the M27.

Interestingly you answer using poopoopants and acuse me of not being able to construct an argument. My only argument is this. Yes, you may well have been right and administration may well lead us into the promised land but lets be honest, it could have also finished us off. Had it happened not in the worst economic downturn for years then maybe people would have had more confidence in your assured done deal and simplified attitude that all was going to be well. It's not even as if the deal is yet done, though it looks a formality. Take a breath and realise how many people looked at us and then turned away for whatever reason before you tell the world how right you were. Some bloke with more money than most has decided to have a punt at the 11th hour. It hardly proves your theory of takeover to have been a mere formality. That said, if it goes through I would gladly buy you a Sprite and Beano comic to keep you quiet at the Millwall game.

What a load of amusing twaddle you speak, you mentalist pecker head.

Brought where?

Any chance of substansiating the thread with a link or an ounce of proof? Not saying its lies but on its own it looks like mischief making to me, designed to get a split reaction.

What a dinlo! There wasnt a large stay away anti Lowe group, just a bunch of people that stopped turning up to watch rubbish or couldnt afford to watch rubbish in this huge financial downturn, but how typical of the slug to come out and slap backs now that their is news that the club may now continue. There wasnt a great deal of noise coming from him stating that they caused it all when we looked doomed (not that they had a bearing on events either way). Stupid plank.

The bank cannot be expected to work out with 100% accuracy the outcome of every business plan put before them. For this reason contracts are drawn up with rules. We broke the rules. Case closed M'lud.

The club borrowed money and couldnt pay it back. The bank is not a charity and after many months called it in. Banks are to blame for a lot right now but not this case.

Is there a Hot Legs reference here yet?

It seems impossible to answer until we know who is buying the club, if anyone. I dont think its beyond the realms of fantasy to rule out Lowe now. Figures of 8 or 9 million quid to buy the club out is not big money and he could well stump up 3 or 4 to be a major shareholder and then back Wotte as he has previously.

Thats not even relevant.

To believe that people get control of football clubs because they are "football men" is a bit short sighted. The two you mentioned are first and foremost businessmen. That you consider them to be real "football men" just shows they are very good at running their business.

The North v South debate has again emerged even from an initial post describing Shirley. Having lived in the North and Midlands for many years, and having been a regular visitor to the North West for over 20 years I feel qualified to say it is grim. Very grim. Having said that I am now back in the wide expanse of countryside that is South Wiltshire and other than the weather being better you still see the same type of people you get up North. These people are now everywhere and do not locate around post codes. I can be outside a thatched cottage that is on the market in this depressed market for over £650,000 yet still be in the locality of a White Lightening park bench drinker. Its not good news for anyone but those pointing out the errors of other peoples areas are really just kidding themselves.

You should have mentioned this needed "list" when you chirped away all season about how great administration would be. You never mentioned desperate collection tins going around just to remain in existance. It was a done deal. Administration = A New Begining.

Does that even make sense?

I have just relocated here. Working at Boscombe Down and currently lodging in Bulford.

Not to mention also increased debt at at least two of those clubs. Not sure they are role models for us at all.

I agree, but cant make it as I have a bad back. Don't wear your best sandals. Yours, Reg.

Are you a bit deluded? Do you honestly think the scandal is in the denomination of the creep and not the act they are committing? Christ alive, get with it. It is caused by enforced abstinence, nothing more. That is why there is such a huge difference in "reported incidents"between the two sectors of christianity.

Having served in the RAF for 12 years I feel you can wind your pongo neck in with the civvy ivory tower stuff. Further to that perhaps you should also recognise that I was responding to a previous post by Stu on a thread where he jokingly commented on "proddy" girls showing him their boobies during his tours in Ireland. Now shut it you bullet absorbing grunt.

Why is it that Catholic religeous "heads" for want of a better word always seem to get involved in this type of thing more than Prodestant ones? I think it is entirely due to the stupid no sex rules they impose, as it is just not natural for a bloke not to spunk his load up something and they pry on kids as they think nobody will find out.