Ponty

That pink streak in her hair certainly detracts the eye from her thigh-sized upper arms.

I don't know why you've brought racism and sexism into the mix Scotty tbh, they seem largely irrelevant in this instance. As for this thread, I know the OP wasn't trying to offend anyone. At the very worst he's trivialised the condition in his first post, and I'm not even sure that's completely true.

That doesn't rule out the possibility that one of the people around the table is setting it up though, but then I guess you'd never have that sort of assurance. People are funny things.

"I am sooooooo random," is not really a sentence of any substance. "I am given to random mood changes, random mannerisms, random comments and random gesticulation," would be acceptable.

How does one verify Ouija board results?

I really hate this modern bastardisation of the word "random".

I think people's time would be better spent making the most of the current life rather than wasting it trying to find evidence that they're going to get another shot at it afterwards. They'd only waste that next one trying to find out if there's a third tier to existence after that anyway.

It's very possibly a Harvestman Spider.

That Robertson goal is ****ing quality.

Aren't 2 threads (on the first page!) on this enough. We all know that those who go are far superior to those who don't go. Or some such ****. http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=2563 http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=2527

Oh come on. It's a ridiculous concept. If ghosts are able to move hands around tables they're sure as ****ing eggs is eggs able to use a whiteboard and a marker pen.

You can also achieve the same results by using your own excrement to daub the names of those you wish to contact on the walls. My missus looked like she'd seen a ghost when she came home anyway.

From Baj's own fingertips Mr Belt. "There are no guidelines in terms of your angle, we will not censor your views, as long as it remains within the confines of the rules of this forum and the guidelines above, in fact we look forward to vastly opposing opinions." I'm sure name-calling is outside of the broad forum rules, and therefore wouldn't be ok in any columns. I'd also like to think that Scooby is actually able to write some useful content without resorting to such actions. It, of course, is possible that I credit people with too much decency but that's where I stand on things.

Oh, coldsores? Shame.

As a clue, the only person banned since the changeover had paid his £5. Much love.

Had to turn that over when faced with nestling acorns in the hot tub scene.

Well, that makes our league stats look a whole lot healthier. Perhaps we're not doomed after all

Good stuff.

I don't really like football that much.

Alpine may have a pessimistic viewpoint but I've NEVER seen him wish for anything other than a Saints victory. He may predict defeats but, as far as I see, never encourages them.

Is this an excerpt from a Swedish manual of some kind?

Any chance of a match update or two?

That Robertson is jammy.

Play it over MSN.. lol